Skip to main content
. 2014 May 13;9(5):e97483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097483

Table 1. Results of two-ratio model tests of selection pressure on the Tat gene in bats.

Modela npb ω0 c ωFix c ModelCompared P-valued
0. One ratio: ω0 55 −8406.72 0.165  = ω0
1. Two ratios: ω0, ωA 56 −8394.02 0.153 0.585 1 vs. 0 25.398 <0.001
2. Two ratios: ω0, ωB 56 −8403.56 0.166 0.0001 2 vs. 0 6.321 >0.05
3. Two ratios: ω0, ωC 56 −8406.72 0.165 0.169 3 vs. 0 0.001 >0.05
4. Two ratios: ω0, ωD 56 −8406.72 0.165 0.0001 4 vs. 0 0.001 >0.05
5. Two ratios: ω0, ωE 56 −8406.51 0.165 0.078 5 vs. 0 0.422 >0.05
6. Two ratios: ω0, ωF 56 −8406.62 0.164 0.237 6 vs. 0 0.187 >0.05
a

See Figure 1B for branch labels.

b

np, number of parameters.

c

ωFixA, ωB, ωC, ωD, ωE and ωF) and ω0, are the ω ratios for branches A, B, C, D, E, F and other branches, respectively.

d

The P-value of each test was multiplied by six (tested branches) to correct for multiple testing.