Skip to main content
. 2014 May 13;9(5):e97417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097417

Table 3. Association of studied polymorphisms with symptomatic DIP OA in the total material and by occupation.

Gene Chr SNP MAF (%) Group MAF (%)This study HWE Symptomatic DIP OA
NCBI HapMap Total Case Control (p-value) OR 95% CI p-value
Replication analyses
A2BP1 16 rs716508 39 28 All 35 35 35 0.09 0.94 0.58–1.52 0.80
Dentists 35 38 35 0.69 0.26–1.81 0.38
Teachers 34 33 34 1.06 0.47–2.38 0.94
COG5 7 rs3757713 14 21 All 19 24 18 0.07 1.46 0.90–2.37 0.13
Dentists 19 23 19 1.35 0.51–3.54 0.62
Teachers 18 24 17 1.81 0.80–4.12 0.16
COG5 7 rs3815148 19 22 All 19 25 18 0.12 1.35 0.83–2.19 0.24
Dentists 19 23 19 1.37 0.52–3.59 0.60
Teachers 18 26 17 1.41 0.61–3.23 0.42
GDF5 20 rs143383 29 32 All 43 39 43 0.55 0.83 0.54–1.29 0.41
Dentists 43 38 43 0.76 0.29–2.00 0.50
Teachers 42 40 43 0.74 0.32–1.69 0.50
HFE 6 rs1799945 8 18 All 13 15 12 0.53 1.49 0.80–2.76 0.22
Dentists 12 18 11 2.29 0.83–6.29 0.11
Teachers 14 14 14 1.41 0.57–3.49 0.48
ESR1 6 rs2234693 44 41 All 40 45 40 0.60 1.27 0.83–1.94 0.28
Dentists 41 45 40 1.33 0.48–3.70 0.56
Teachers 40 45 39 1.47 0.62–3.46 0.38
ESR1 6 rs9340799 26 30 All 25 31 25 0.20 1.39 0.86–2.24 0.19
Dentists 27 23 27 0.50 0.19–1.33 0.15
Teachers 24 36 22 2.84 1.25–6.48 0.01
Exploratory analyses
PTGS2 1 rs4140564 4 8 All 7 4 7 0.35 0.53 0.18–1.56 0.22
Dentists 6 0 6
Teachers 8 7 8 0.83 0.26–2.64 0.73
PARD3B 2 rs1207421 13 9 All 10 10 10 1.00 0.91 0.45–1.87 0.80
Dentists 10 10 10 0.90 0.28–2.93 0.84
Teachers 10 10 10 0.79 0.27–2.25 0.68
DVWA 3 rs7639618 26 18 All 16 14 16 0.95 0.93 0.50–1.71 0.81
Dentists 18 13 18 0.81 0.27–2.36 0.70
Teachers 14 16 14 1.02 0.42–2.52 0.97
HLA 6 rs10947262 17 6 All 14 13 14 0.68 0.90 0.48–1.68 0.74
Dentists 15 20 14 1.78 0.67–4.71 0.25
Teachers 14 9 14 0.59 0.21–1.64 0.32
BCAP29 7 rs10953541 14 27 All 26 32 25 0.18 1.36 0.86–2.15 0.19
Dentists 27 28 27 1.07 0.42–2.77 0.99
Teachers 24 35 23 1.64 0.73–3.65 0.21
DUS4L 7 rs4730250 12 17 All 15 20 15 0.23 1.44 0.84–2.45 0.19
Dentists 16 20 16 1.76 0.66–4.65 0.31
Teachers 14 21 14 1.49 0.63–3.50 0.34
TRIB1 8 rs4512391 38 41 All 26 20 27 0.95 0.67 0.39–1.15 0.14
Dentists 27 25 28 0.99 0.39–2.53 0.96
Teachers 25 17 26 0.53 0.22–1.23 0.13
DIO2 14 rs225014 42 39 All 28 31 28 0.10 1.13 0.69–1.85 0.63
Dentists 28 35 27 1.76 0.66–4.68 0.28
Teachers 28 28 29 0.92 0.41–2.04 0.79
TGFB1 19 rs1800470/rs1982073 44 NA All 29 40 28 0.58 1.84 1.162.91 0.01
Dentists 31 40 30 1.57 0.60–4.09 0.36
Teachers 28 40 26 2.72 1.166.39 0.03

Logistic regression analysis with log-additive model in group “All”, and dominant model in groups “Dentists” and “Teachers”.

ORs and 95% CIs are adjusted for age, occupation and body mass index (BMI) in group “All” and for age and BMI in groups “Dentists” and “Teachers”.

NCBI-population is 1000 genomes.

HapMap population is CEU: Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry from the CEPH collection.