Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Spine J. 2013 Oct 23;14(7):1228–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.043

Table 4.

Comparisons of Radiographs Measurements Between Control and CASP-S Group

Control group / CASP-S group
One, two, three level (n=61)
Median (interquartile)
One level subgroup (n=32)
Median (interquartile)
C5/6 fusion sub-subgroup (n=28)
Median (interquartile)
Distance from fusion mass to C2 plumb line 10(5–14) / 7(3–13) p=0.233* 10(6.5–14.5) / 7.5(3–13) p=0.092* 11(8–16) / 8.5(5–14) p=0.086*
Distance from fusion mass to C7 plumb line 11(8–15) / 9(6–13) p=0.095* 11(8–14) / 9(6–11) p=0.053* 11(7–13) / 8(6–9) p=0.021*
Distance from C2 to C7 sagittal plumb line 20(16–28) / 17(10–27) p=0.117* 20(18–27) / 17(10–23) p=0.044* 20(18–28) / 17(11–22) p=0.032*
Sagittal slope angle of superior endplate of vertebrae caudally adjacent to fusion mass 28(24–34) / 26(21–32) p=0.112 28(24–34) / 24(21–32) p=0.058 29(24–34) / 24(21–31) p=0.034
T1 sagittal slope angle 30(26–35) / 28(23–33) p=0.100 30(26–34) / 26(22–33) p=0.075 30(27–34) / 25(22–33) p=0.049
Caudally adjacent disc angle −4(−6, −1) / −3(−7, −1) p=0.496* −4(−6, −2) / −3(−8, −1) p=0.808* −4(−5, −2) / −3(−7, −1) p=0.664*
Alignment of the fusion mass −1(−6,1) / 0(−8,5) p=0.564 0(−3,3) / 0(−7,7) p=0.808 0(−2,4) / 0(−5,8) p=0.856
Overall cervical sagittal alignment 22(−28, −13) / −18(−24, −9) p=0.101 −21(−25, −10) / −15(−23, −7) p=0.424 −21(−25, −10) / −14(−22, −5) p=0.328

Note : t-test was used due to the normal distribution.

*

Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used if variables are not normal distributed.