Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Spine J. 2013 Oct 23;14(7):1228–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.043

Table 5.

Univariate Risk Factors for Predicting Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology requiring Surgery in Patients with C5/6 Level Fusion (n=54)

Risk Factor OR (95% CI) unit=5 p value c-index
Distance from fusion mass to C2 plumb line 1.312 (0.894, 1.925) 0.166 0.637
Distance from fusion mass to C7 plumb line 2.463 (1.143, 5.304) 0.021 0.683
Distance from C2 to C7 sagittal plumb line 1.345 (0.993, 1.821) 0.055 0.670
C7 sagittal slope angle 1.481 (1.016, 2.157) 0.041 0.669
T1 sagittal slope angle 1.469 (0.993, 2.173) 0.055 0.661
Caudally adjacent disc angle 0.901 (0.433, 1.875) 0.781 0.535
Alignment of the fusion mass 0.963(0.649, 1.428) 0.850 0.519
Overall cervical sagittal alignment 0.884 (0.692, 1.129) 0.322 0.587
Straight vs. Lordosis 2.190 (0.657, 7.285) 0.202 0.581

Note: c-index, usually 0.90–1 = excellent, 0.80–0.90 = good, 0.70–0.80 = fair, 0.60–0.70 = poor, 0.50–0.60 = fail