Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Sep 1;70(17):1518–1527. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120599

Table 3. Cost-effectiveness of Voriconazole Versus Fluconazole in Patients With Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants, 12-Month Outcomes.

Total Study Population AML Subpopulation

Outcome Voriconazole Fluconazole Difference Voriconazole Fluconazole Difference
Clinical outcomes
IFI events 0.127 0.137 -0.011 0.145 0.228 -0.083
Life-years 8.219 8.269 -0.05 7.911 6.891 1.020
Costsa
Planned prophylaxis $9,774 $1,104 $8,670b $10,142 $990 $9,152b
Other prophylaxis $3,162 $1,165 $1,997 $2,809 $897 $1,911
Empirical therapy $1,744 $2,284 -$540 $1,805 $2,400 -$595
IFI treatment $6,870 $8,278 -$1,408 $8,164 $13,070 -$4,906
Total $21,549 $12,831 $8,718b $22,919 $17,358 $5,562
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
Incremental cost per IFI avoided $812,990 $66,919
Incremental cost per life-year gained Dominatedc $5,453

AML = acute myeloid leukemia; IFI = invasive fungal infection.

a

Costs in 2011 US$.

b

95% confidence limits estimated using the bootstrap analysis do not include zero.

c

Dominated means that treatment with voriconazole was both more expensive and resulted in fewer estimated life years than treatment with fluconazole.