Skip to main content
. 2014 May 14;34(20):6849–6859. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4993-13.2014

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Main experiment: M1 versus sham stimulation. Changes in MEP amplitudes after M1 (squares) and sham stimulation (diamonds), normalized to baseline MEP amplitudes. Significant aftereffects after M1-iTBS compared with sham-iTBS or within stimulation conditions: *p ≤ 0.05 (Student's t test); **p ≤ 0.001 (Student's t test). M1-iTBS led to a significant increase in MEP amplitudes after iTBS600, iTBS1200, and iTBS1800 compared with sham stimulation and baseline. The increase after M1-iTBS1800 was significantly higher than that after M1-iTBS600 and M1-iTBS1200, whereas after sham-iTBS MEP amplitudes significantly decreased between iTBS1200 and iTBS1800.