Table 9.
Sexual violence, broken down by Refugee vs Cameroonian
| Characteristic | Refugee n = 77 | Refugee % (95% CI)* | Cameroonian n = 128 | Cameroonian % (95% CI)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lifetime prevalence |
78** (191) |
40.8 (31.5 – 50.8) |
128 (395) |
32.4 (25.2 – 40.5) |
| Sexual violence in the past 6 months |
30 |
39.0 (21.7 – 59.6) |
49 |
38.3 (28.4 – 49.2) |
|
Perpetrator |
|
|
|
|
| Husband |
40 |
52.0 (35.4 – 68.1) |
91 |
71.1 (61.0 – 79.5) |
| Member of my family |
0 |
|
1 |
0.8 (0–6) |
| Friend or Member of the Community |
12 |
15.6 (8.3 – 27.2) |
28 |
21.2 (13.9 – 32.8) |
| Soldier/rebel or coupeurs de route*** |
30 |
39.0 (25.6 – 54.2) |
5 |
3.9 (1.4 – 10.5) |
| Unknown |
3 |
3.9 (1.3 – 11.5) |
3 |
2.3 (0.7 – 7.3) |
| Multiple perpetrators | 29 | 37.7 (22.9 – 52.5) | 8 | 6.3 (1.6 – 10.9) |
*Data presented as mean % and weighted % (95% CI).
**The above respondent identified as ‘refugee’, thus further analyses are on 77 refugees only.
***8 people said both soldiers/rebel and coupers de route in a multiple perp sexual violence. Soldiers/rebels and coupers de route were combined based on qualitative data collected by the authors that suggests overlap among these groups in Northwest CAR.