Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 7;160(1):18–29. doi: 10.7326/M13-0768

Table 3.

Model Results: 1-Year Treatment and Lifetime Treatment

Treatment Average
Procedures, n
Complications,
Excluding
Minor
Complications,
n*
Total Time
Spent With
Blindness
(Visual
Acuity
20/200 or
worse), y
Total Time
Spent With
Stable or
Improved
Visual Acuity,
y
Total Time
Spent With ≥5
Letters of
Visual Acuity
Improvement,
y
Total Time
Spent With
Visual Acuity
20/30
or better, y
Lifetime
Costs, $
Lifetime
QALYs
ICER, $/QALY§
1-y treatment
  Laser treatment plus
  triamcinolone
2.9 laser
treatments and 2.9
injections
0.32 0.10 13.63 13.06 10.61 97 998 5.63 (Reference
strategy) **
  Laser treatment plus a VEGF
  inhibitor
1.8 laser
treatments and 8.2
injections
0.11 0.03 13.76 13.28 10.57 104 973 6.19 12 410
  Monotherapy with a VEGF
  inhibitor
8.3 injections 0.05 0.02 13.74 13.17 9.64 106 213 6.16 (Dominated) ††
  Triamcinolone monotherapy 1.8 injections 0.13 0.12 11.94 3.21 0.66 167 162 4.33 (Dominated) ††
  No treatment None 0.00‡‡ 0.12 12.42 0.00 0.00 169 469 4.58 (Dominated) ††
  Laser monotherapy 1.9 laser
treatments
0.04 0.12 11.75 3.47 0.75 170 027 4.66 (Dominated) ††
Lifetime treatment §§
  Laser treatment plus
  triamcinolone
2.9 laser
treatments and
13.7 injections
0.59 0.10 13.66 13.09 12.52 97 493 5.16 (Reference
strategy) **
  Laser treatment plus a VEGF
  inhibitor
1.8 laser
treatments and
40.6 injections
0.33 0.03 13.79 13.33 12.46 126 082 6.24 26 477
  Monotherapy with a VEGF
  inhibitor
40.7 injections 0.27 0.01 13.78 13.27 12.26 133 126 6.23 (Dominated) ††
  Triamcinolone monotherapy 12.6 injections 0.45 0.12 12.70 3.44 0.85 162 831 3.73 (Dominated) ††
  Laser monotherapy 6.3 laser treatments 0.15 0.12 12.23 3.64 0.89 167 341 4.70 (Dominated) ††
  No treatment None 0.00‡‡ 0.12 12.42 0.00 0.00 169 469 4.58 (Dominated) ††

ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY = quality-adjusted life-year; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor.

*

Number of complications occurring during treatment, in excess of baseline.

Values were normalized to the no-treatment group to adjust for starting visual acuity distributions.

Undiscounted, over lifetime follow-up.

§

Relative to the next best alternative.

Treatment administered over 1 y, with subsequent lifetime follow-up.

Unlike in other strategies, the lifetime QALYs associated with triamcinolone therapies decrease in going from the 1-y treatment model to the lifetime model. This is due to an increased likelihood of glaucoma and cataract with lifetime treatment (see Complications section in the Supplement, available at www.annals.org, for further details).

**

Baseline comparator for calculation of ICER. Represents the reference point on the cost-effectiveness frontier (Figure 2).

††

Costs more and is less effective than another strategy.

‡‡

Baseline defined by the number of complication events in the untreated (clinical observation) group.

§§

Treatment administered over lifetime.