Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Med Med Res. 2014 Apr 16;4(8):1641–1662. doi: 10.9734/BJMMR/2014/7317

Table 6.

Stepwise logistic regression analysis of MF occupational classifications and MMSE Score: main effects and interactions

Variable (Classes) Risk Factors In Model Odds Ratio (per unit) P-Value 95% CI
L vs M/H MF MF × Smoke Hx 3.2 < 0.02 1.2 – 6.8
 65–74, 75–84, 85+ Age Group × Stroke Hx 3.0 < 0.02 1.7 – 5.4
Age Group 3.0 < 0.0001 2.0 – 4.7
L vs M/H MF MF × Age Group 3.0 < 0.02 1.2 – 7.9
 65–74, 75+ Age Group × Stroke Hx 5.1 < 0.0001 2.3 – 11.4
Age Group × Smoke Hx 3.7 < 0.0001 1.9 – 7.1
Hearing × Gender (Women*) 2.5 < 0.02 1.2 – 5.2
L vs H MF MF × Smoke Hx 8.9 < 0.0001 2.7 – 29.5
 65–74, 75–84, 85+ Age Group × Stroke Hx 3.0 < 0.0001 1.6 – 5.4
Age Group 3.0 < 0.0001 1.9 – 4.7
L vs H MF MF × Age Group 6.8 0.0006 2.3 – 20.4
 65–74, 75+ Age Group × Stroke Hx 5.0 < 0.0001 2.2 – 11.4
Age Group × Smoke Hx 3.9 0.0002 2.0 – 7.4
Hearing × Gender (Women*) 2.3 < 0.03 1.1 – 4.8
L vs M/H MF MF × Smoke Hx 4.6 < 0.005 1.6 – 13.0
 75+ Stroke Hx 5.0 < 0.0001 2.2 – 11.0
L vs H MF MF × Smoke Hx 17.8 < 0.0001 4.6 – 69.1
 75+ Stroke Hx 5.2 < 0.0001 2.3 – 11.8
*

In the analyses, women were coded as 1 and men were coded as 0.