Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 14;17(2):119–125. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2013.51

Table 4. Association of clinical variables and RasGRP3 protein expression with cancer-specific survival based on Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
  HR (95% CI) P-value Adjusted HR (95% CI) Adjusted P-value
Preoperative PSA
 <10 vs ⩾10 0.927 (0.496–1.734) 0.813 0.687 (0.254–1.859) 0.459
         
Gleason score
 ⩽6 vs ⩾7 2.222 (1.019–4.848) 0.045 1.461 (0.675–3.162) 0.336
         
T stage
 ⩽2 vs ⩾3 2.260 (1.126–4.536) 0.022 1.162 (0.452–2.992) 0.755
         
Lymph node status
 Positive vs negative 1.328 (0.691–2.554) 0.395 0.574 (0.263–1.254) 0.164
         
Surgical margin status
 Positive vs negative 1.644 (0.873–3.097) 0.124 1.807 (0.780–4.189) 0.168
         
RasGRP3 expression
 Positive vs negative 7.798 (4.142–17.983) <0.001 7.536 (4.405–16.015) 0.003

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; RasGRP3, guanyl nucleotide-releasing protein for Ras 3.