Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gut. 2013 Aug 14;63(2):326–336. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304121

Table 5. Additional genetic variants nominally significantly associated with colorectal-cancer risk in meta-analyses using dominant or recessive models.

Number evaluated Colorectal-cancer risk meta-analysis Venice
criteria
grade
False-positive
report
probability§
Cumulative
evidence of
association


Genes Variants Alleles * Chromosome MAF (%) Ethnicity Studies Cases Controls Genetic models OR (95% CI) P value I2 (%) Pheterogeneity
SELS rs34713741 T/C 15 33.22 All 3 1,442 2,071 Dominant 1.21 (1.05-1.39) 0.008 0 0.40 AAC 0.235 Weak
SERPINE1/PAI-1 rs1799889 5G/4G 7 44.94 White 4 2,241 4,534 Dominant 0.87 (0.78-0.97) 0.014 0 0.56 AAC 0.337 Weak
EPHX1 rs2234922 G/A 1 19.38 All 13 5,329 6,700 Dominant 0.91 (0.85-0.99) 0.020 0 0.50 AAC 0.46 Weak
ERCC5/XPG rs17655 C/G 13 24.73 All 9 6,322 7,537 Dominant 1.13 (1.01-1.25) 0.027 38 0.12 ABC 0.48 Weak
RAD18 rs373572 C/T 3 29.22 All 3 3,174 3,397 Dominant 1.18 (1.01-1.37) 0.033 27 0.25 ABC 0.55 Weak
CCND1 rs9344 A/G 11 48.15 All 22 6,316 8,272 Dominant 1.13 (1.01-1.26) 0.035 43 0.00 ABC 0.569 Weak
IGF1 rs35767 T/C 12 24.75 All 3 2,717 4,880 Recessive 0.75 (0.62-0.91) 0.003 0 0.57 BAC 0.11 Weak
MGMT rs12917 T/C 10 12.99 All 7 4,127 7,284 Recessive 1.54 (1.14-2.08) 0.005 0 0.47 BAA 0.158 Weak
CRP rs1800947 C/G 1 5.70 All 4 2,916 3,544 Recessive 3.84 (1.38-10.74) 0.010 0 0.47 CAC 0.277 Weak
HPGD rs2612656 G/A 4 22.75 White 3 2,979 5,575 Recessive 1.31 (1.05-1.64) 0.016 21 0.28 BAC 0.380 Weak
FRZB rs7775 G/C 2 8.77 White 3 1,256 3,000 Recessive 3.20 (1.17-8.73) 0.023 64 0.06 CCC 0.468 Weak
TGFBR1 rs334354 A/G 9 26.71 All 4 1,226 2,776 Recessive 1.38 (1.04-1.84) 0.029 8 0.35 BAC 0.516 Weak
TGFB1 rs4803455 A/C 19 47.48 All 3 2,786 3,516 Recessive 1.14 (1.01-1.28) 0.030 0 0.37 AAC 0.536 Weak
LIPC rs6083 A/G 15 36.52 All 3 4,702 4,914 Recessive 0.85 (0.74-0.99) 0.032 25 0.27 AAA 0.56 Weak
MTHFR rs1801133 T/C 1 33.50 All 68 32,608 44,383 Recessive 0.92 (0.85-1) 0.036 52 0.00 ACC 0.61 Weak
CYP2C9 rs1799853 T/C 10 13.31 White 6 4,915 5,237 Recessive 1.36 (1.02-1.83) 0.038 0 0.76 BAA 0.60 Weak
MTRR rs10380 T/C 5 9.31 White 4 3,869 5,141 Recessive 1.61 (1.02-2.52) 0.039 6 0.36 BAA 0.597 Weak
*

Minor alleles/Major alleles (Per Caucasian); majors alleles were treated as reference alleles in the analyses

Allelic ORs were estimated under the additive model. For dominant or recessive models, ORs were estimated for subjects who carry one or two minor alleles or subjects homozygous for the minor alleles, respectively.

MAF=minor allele frequency in controls.

OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.

Venice criteria grades are for amount of evidence, replication of the association, and protection from bias.

§

False-positive report probability (FPRP) was determined based on OR and P value of each variant from meta-analysis and a prior probability of 0.05.

Cumulative epidemiological evidence as graded by combination of results from Venice criteria and FPRP for association with colorectal-cancer risk.