Skip to main content
. 2014 May 14;9(5):e97289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097289

Table 5. Meta-analysis for the association of rs1883832 with ischemic stroke.

Genetic model OR 95%CI P P heterogeneity I2
C/C versus T/T Crude OR1: 0.684 (0.506, 0.926) 0.014 0.933 0%
Modified OR1: 0.666 (0.477, 0.930) 0.017
C/T versus T/T Crude OR2: 1.216 (0.749, 1.974) 0.429 0.093 64.6%
Modified OR2: 1.190 (0.866, 1.635) 0.283
C/C versus C/T Crude OR3: 0.556 (0.341, 0.907) 0.019 0.04 76.4%
Modified OR3: 0.562 (0.402, 0.787) 0.001
Dominant model (C/C and C/T) versus T/T OR4: 0.992 (0.691, 1.423) 0.965 0.188 42.3%
Recessive model C/C versus (C/T and T/T) OR5: 0.582 (0.393, 0.864) 0.007 0.085 66.3%
Additive model OR6: 0.785 (0.679, 0.909) 0.001 0.550 0%

Included publications: Ma Y, 2013; Zhang BK,2013.

Likelihood ratio test: LR = 22.04, P<0.001.

Pooled C allele frequency: 49.9% (31.9%–67.8%), P heterogeneity<0.001, I2 = 98.4%.

Abbreviation: IS, ischemic stroke; OR, odds ratio; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.