Skip to main content
. 2014 May 8;5:378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378

Table 3.

Results of moderator analyses of negative affect.

Moderator Level k Estimate [95% CI] p p for diff
Task Feedback (Ref) 8 0.212 [0.057, 0.367] 0.0074
Stand 7 0.184 [0.021, 0.347] 0.0269 0.810
Stick 15 0.235 [0.126, 0.344] <0.0001 0.810
Instruction Implicit (Ref) 10 0.103 [−0.018, 0.225] 0.0959
Explicit 17 0.249 [0.159, 0.339] <0.0001 0.059
Explicit-converted 3 0.389 [0.155, 0.624] 0.0012 0.034
Stimulus type Faces (Ref) 16 0.134 [0.034, 0.235] 0.0089
Pictures 5 0.322 [0.143, 0.502] 0.0279 0.074
Words 5 0.277 [0.119, 0.434] 0.0006 0.136
Relevant 4 0.348 [0.107, 0.589] 0.0047 0.110
Design Independent 1 0.504 [−0.301, 1.308] 0.220
Repeated 29 0.214 [0.138, 0.290] <0.0001 0.482
Valence Explicit 24 0.203 [0.130, 0.2761] <0.0001
Implicit 1 0.518 [0.159, 0.8775] 0.0047 0.092

Note. Ref, reference level that was deemed most informative for the comparison; k, number of studies; [95% CI], 95% confidence interval; p, p-value for each level; p for diff, p-value for difference between respective level and reference level. Task: Stand, vertical button stand; Joystick, joystick/lever; Feedback, feedback-joystick. Stimulus type: Words, emotional words; Pictures, emotional pictures; Faces, emotional facial expressions; Relevant, personally relevant stimuli. Design: Repeated, repeated measures design; Independent, independent groups design. Valence: Explicit, explicitly valenced stimuli; Implicit, implicitly valenced stimuli.