Skip to main content
. 2014 May 8;5:378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378

Table 4.

Results of subset analyses of negative affect after exclusion of studies with implicit instructions.

Moderator Level k Estimate [95% CI] p p for diff
Task Feedback (Ref) 2 0.244 [−0.017, 0.505] 0.067
Stand 6 0.251 [0.094, 0.408] 0.0017 0.964
Stick 12 0.278 [0.173, 0.382] <0.0001 0.815
Instruction Explicit 17 0.248 [0.165, 0.331] <0.0001
Explicit-converted 3 0.385 [0.169, 0.601] 0.0005 0.246
Stimulus type Faces (Ref) 9 0.202 [0.076, 0.328] 0.0017
Pictures 5 0.317 [0.158, 0.476] <0.0001 0.266
Words 5 0.272 [0.135, 0.408] <0.0001 0.463
Relevant 1 0.769 [0.222, 1.316] 0.0058 0.048
Design Independent 1 0.504 [−0.273, 1.281] 0.204
Repeated 19 0.263 [0.185, 0.341] <0.0001 0.546
Valence Explicit 19 0.247 [0.173, 0.320] <0.0001
Implicit 1 0.518 [0.227, 0.809] 0.0005 0.076

Note. Ref, reference level that was deemed most informative for the comparison; k, number of studies; [95% CI], 95% confidence interval; p, p-value for each level; p for diff, p-value for difference between respective level and reference level. Task: Stand, vertical button stand; Joystick, joystick/lever; Feedback, feedback-joystick. Stimulus type: Words, emotional words; Pictures, emotional pictures; Faces, emotional facial expressions; Relevant, personally relevant stimuli. Design: Repeated, repeated measures design; Independent, independent groups design. Valence: Explicit, explicitly valenced stimuli; Implicit, implicitly valenced stimuli.