Skip to main content
. 2014 May 8;5:378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378

Table 5.

Results of moderator analyses of both affects.

Moderator Level k Estimate [95% CI] p p for diff
Task Feedback (Ref) 1 0.094 [−0.323, 0.511] 0.659
Abstract 3 0.281 [0.030, 0.532] 0.028 0.450
Stand 1 0.662 [0.212, 1.111] 0.0039 0.069
Stick 17 0.305 [0.187, 0.423] <0.0001 0.340
Instruction Implicit (Ref) 6 0.076 [−0.027, 0.180] 0.1447
Explicit 9 0.403 [0.286, 0.521] <0.0001 <0.0001
Explicit-converted 7 0.433 [0.295, 0.571] <0.0001 <0.0001
Stimulus type Faces (Ref) 3 0.146 [−0.123, 0.415] 0.2861
Pictures 4 0.321 [0.071, 0.571] 0.0119 0.352
Words 15 0.343 [0.215, 0.472] <0.0001 0.194
Design Independent 2 0.749 [0.190, 1.305] 0.0086
Repeated 20 0.291 [0.190, 0.393] <0.0001 0.115
Valence Explicit 20 0.297 [0.187, 0.406] <0.0001
Implicit 2 0.409 [0.088, 0.730] 0.0126 0.517

Note. Ref, reference level that was deemed most informative for the comparison; k, number of studies; [95% CI], 95% confidence interval; p, p-value for each level; p for diff, p-value for difference between respective level and reference level. Task: Stand, vertical button stand; Joystick, joystick/lever; Feedback, feedback-joystick; Abstract, abstract manikin task. Stimulus type: Words, emotional words; Pictures, emotional pictures; Faces, emotional facial expressions. Design: Repeated, repeated measures design; Independent, independent groups design. Valence: Explicit, explicitly valenced stimuli; Implicit, implicitly valenced stimuli.