Skip to main content
. 2014 May 8;5:378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378

Table 6.

Results of subset analyses of both affects.

Moderator Level k Estimate [95% CI] p p for diff
Task Abstract (Ref) 1 0.729 [0.373, 1.084] <0.0001
Stand 1 0.662 [0.348, 0.975] <0.0001 0.782
Stick 14 0.368 [0.268, 0.468] <0.0001 0.056
Instruction Explicit 9 0.415 [0.267, 0.562] <0.0001
Explicit-converted 7 0.443 [0.271, 0.614] <0.0001 0.809
Stimulus type Faces (Ref) 2 0.210 [−0.067, 0.487] 0.1376
Pictures 3 0.423 [0.176, 0.670] 0.0008 0.260
Words 11 0.474 [0.342, 0.606] <0.0001 0.091
Design Independent 2 0.749 [0.219, 1.280] 0.0056
Repeated 14 0.411 [0.302, 0.520] <0.0001 0.221
Valence Explicit 15 0.431 [0.308, 0.555] <0.0001
Implicit 2 0.406 [0.130, 0.682] 0.0039 0.872

Note. Ref, reference level that was deemed most informative for the comparison; k, number of studies; [95% CI], 95% confidence interval; p, p-value for each level; p for diff, p-value for difference between respective level and reference level. Task: Stand, vertical button stand; Joystick, joystick/lever; Abstract, abstract manikin task. Stimulus type: Words, emotional words; Pictures, emotional pictures; Faces, emotional facial expressions. Design: Repeated, repeated measures design; Independent, independent groups design. Valence: Explicit, explicitly valenced stimuli; Implicit, implicitly valenced stimuli.