Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 7;29(3):388–432. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu012

Table IV.

Overview of reviewed studies and interventions

Characteristics Total Two group design Triple P studies
n (%) n (%) (within category) n (%) (within category)
Total 17 (100.0) 9 (52.9) 5 (29.4)
Evaluation designa
    RCT 7 (41.2) 7 (100.0) 4 (57.1)
    Two group (non-RCT) 2 (11.8) 2 (100.0) 1 (50)
    Single group, pre–post or time series 4 (23.5) 0 (0) 0 (0)
    Single group, other (e.g. one measurement) 4 (23.5) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Prevention type
    Primary 12 (70.6) 7 (58.3) 3 (25.0)
    Primary and secondary 4 (25.3) 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0)
    Secondary and tertiary 1 (5.9) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Primary outcome targeted
    Shaken baby syndrome/AHT 6 (35.3) 2 (33.3) 0 (0)
    Positive parenting (Triple P) 5 (29.4) 5 (100) 5 (100)
    Positive parenting (other/not Triple P or AHT) 3 (17.6) 2 (66.7) 0 (0)
    Other (e.g. abuse recognition) 3 (17.6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Positive outcomesb
    Any (below groups not mutually exclusive) 13 (76.5) 9 (69.2) 5 (38.5)
    Child abuse or AHT, reduction 3 (17.6) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3)
    Parenting behavior, improvement 4 (17.6) 4 (100.0) 3 (75.0)
    Child behavior, improvement 4 (25.3) 4 (100.0) 4 (4/100)
    Other (e.g. parent mental health, intentions; community knowledge, attitudes, reporting) 11 (64.7) 7 (63.6) 4 (36.4)
No. of risk factors addressed
    7–8 6 (35.3) 6 (100.0) 5 (100.0)
    5–6 3 (17.6) 1 (33.3) 0 (0)
    3–4 5 (29.4) 1 (20.0) 0 (0)
    1–2 3 (17.6) 1 (33.3) 0 (0)

aIf more than one design was used in a study, the study was credited for the ‘better’ design.

bPositive outcomes were classified as those that were statistically significant at P < 0.05 in the desired direction for RCTs, other two group designs and single group pre–post or time series designs; no findings from studies (n = 4) with single time point or ambiguous time point surveys were included.

AHT, abusive head trauma.