Table 1.
Descriptive statistics
| |
Food advertisement |
Non-food advertisement |
p-value of test of equality across groups |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High cognitive load | Low cognitive load | High cognitive load | Low cognitive load | Food vs Non-food adverts | High vs Low cog. load | |
| N |
92 |
89 |
86 |
84 |
|
|
| Female (%) |
67% |
72% |
79% |
80% |
0.04 |
0.57 |
| Foreign (%) |
12% |
11% |
16% |
15% |
0.24 |
0.84 |
| High Income (%) |
41% |
36% |
47% |
43% |
0.25 |
0.39 |
| Low Income (%) |
45% |
48% |
36% |
39% |
0.10 |
0.51 |
| Income missing (%) |
14% |
16% |
17% |
18% |
0.49 |
0.79 |
| Quality of diet (1-5)a |
2.75 |
2.63 |
2.85 |
2.74 |
0.25 |
0.20 |
| (Standard deviation) |
(0.86) |
(0.80) |
(0.77) |
(0.91) |
|
|
| Weekly Fast Food consumption (times/week) |
1.24 |
1.80 |
1.26 |
1.67 |
0.80 |
0.02 |
| (Standard deviation) |
(1.47) |
(2.35) |
(1.32) |
(2.20) |
|
|
| Regular Excercise (%) |
43% |
56% |
52% |
56% |
0.25 |
0.06 |
| Year of expected Graduation |
2014.6 |
2014.5 |
2014.3 |
2014.6 |
0.46 |
0.46 |
| (Standard deviation) | (1.17) | (1.32) | (1.25) | (1.21) | ||
aLikert scale: Excellent (5); Very Good (4); Good (3); Fair (2); Poor (1).