Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 17;15:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-70

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of participating and non-participating GPs

Characteristic Intervention (N = 59) Control (N = 53) Non-participants (N = 761)
Male gender
39 (66%)
31 (58.5%)
478 (65.4%)#
Mean age at start of study (SD)
45 (6.9)#
49 (7.7)#
48.1 (8.0)
Mean FTE (SD)
0.84 (0.2)
0.97 (1.2)
0.83 (0.56)
Mean size of patient population (SD)
2158 (627)
2179 (730)
2153 (689)
Working area
Rural
18 (31%)
14 (26%)
148 (20%)
Urbanised rural
23 (39%)
16 (57%)
306 (41%)
Urban
3 (5%)
10 (19%)
142 (19%)
Big city
15 (25%)
13 (25%)
145 (20%)
Practice type
Solo
20 (34%)
24 (45%)
193 (26%)#
Duo
23 (39%)
22 (42%)
216 (29%)#
Group
10 (17%)
5 (9%)
213 (29%)#
Health Centre
6 (10%)
2 (4%)
79 (11%)#
Other
 
 
42 (6%)#
Average hours of training in alcohol problems before start of study (SD)
0.51 (1.1)
0.36 (0.97)
n.m.
Role security ¥ : total (SD)*
5.0 (0.91)
5.1 (0.76)
5.2 (0.82)
Role adequacy
4.4 (1.06)
4.4 (1.12)
4.6 (1.05)
Role legitimacy
5.6 (1.20)
5.7 (1.04)
5.7 (1.07)
Therapeutic commitment ± : total (SD)*
3.9 (0.92)
3.9 (0.74)
3.9 (0.76)
Task-specific self-esteem
3.9 (1.14)
3.7 (1.22)
4.0 (1.11)
Work satisfaction
3.3 (1.32)
3.5 (1.20)
3.6 (0.88)
Motivation 4.5 (1.06) 4.5 (1.01) 4.2 (1.10)

#Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to participating GPs; n.m. = not measured; ¥= Role security is calculated by the average of role adequacy and role legitimacy; ±Therapeutic commitment is calculated by the average of task-specific self-esteem, work satisfaction and motivation; *minimal role security = 1 and maximum role security = 7.