Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 2;92:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.045

Table 2.

Percent signal change, noise level, the number of activated voxels, and t-value in block-designed S1 and OB fMRI obtained with the GRE sequencea.

Area Sampling pattern Percent change Noise level # of active voxels t-value
Positive only Positive + Negative
S1 Full 6.5±2.2% 5.4±0.4% 51±13 69±17 4.8±1.0
R=2 Gaussian 4.1±1.3% 5.1±0.5% 53±11 80±43 5.1±0.8
Rand+C6 3.3±1.2% 5.0±0.3% 59±8 90±32 5.1±0.5
R=4 Gaussian 2.2±0.5% 3.8±0.4% 50±11 95±28 5.4±0.6
Rand+C6 2.1±0.6% 4.1±0.4% 77±18 117±33 5.6±0.6
OB Full −4.2±0.5% 14.5±2.8% 1433±351 1519±370 3.1±0.2
R=4 Gaussian −3.6±0.3% 10.3±1.4% 3985±489 4442±71 3.9±0.3
Rand+C6 −4.1±0.4% 9.8±2.4% 5113±717 5451±751 4.9±0.8
a

Percent change, noise level, and t-value were obtained from the ROI, while # of activated voxels were calculated from entire images. “Positive only” and “Positive+Negative” refer to the sign of t values of the activated voxels (p<0.01). Results in S1 were first obtained from each scan and then averaged across 6 scans (n = 6). Results in OB with Rand+C6 and Full patterns were first obtained from GLM analysis of 3 concatenated scans and then averaged across different concatenated sets (n = 8). Results in OB with Gaussian sampling were first obtained from GLM analysis of 3 concatenated scans and then averaged across different concatenated sets (n = 4). The errors are standard deviations.