Table 4.
Summary of the hierarchical regression analysis for P50m latency
| |
|
Left |
Right |
N |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
|
β |
β |
|||||||
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | t in step 3 | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | t in step3 | |||
| TD |
Age (months) |
−0.463* |
−0.657* |
−0.358 |
−1.380 |
−0.267 |
−0.599 |
−0.268 |
−0.982 |
33 |
| |
Non-verbal performance |
|
0.248 |
0.307 |
1.302 |
|
0.423 |
0.488 |
1.972 |
|
| |
Riddles |
|
|
−0.521* |
−2.681 |
|
|
−0.577* |
−2.823 |
|
| |
R |
0.463 |
0.487 |
0.624 |
|
0.267 |
0.374 |
0.570 |
|
|
| |
Adjusted R2 |
0.214 |
0.237 |
0.389 |
|
0.071 |
0.140 |
0.325 |
|
|
| |
ΔR2 |
0.189 |
0.187 |
0.326 |
|
0.041 |
0.082 |
0.255 |
|
|
| ASD |
Age (months) |
−0.058 |
−0.100 |
−0.122 |
−0.553 |
−0.435* |
−0.503* |
−0.583* |
−3.092 |
30 |
| |
Non-verbal performance |
|
0.192 |
0.162 |
0.677 |
|
0.308 |
0.199 |
0.974 |
|
| |
Riddles |
|
|
0.058 |
0.218 |
|
|
0.214 |
0.935 |
|
| |
R |
0.058 |
0.196 |
0.201 |
|
0.435 |
0.528 |
0.550 |
|
|
| |
Adjusted R2 |
0.003 |
0.038 |
0.040 |
|
0.189 |
0.279 |
0.302 |
|
|
| ΔR2 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.160 | 0.226 | 0.222 | ||||
*p < 0.025.