Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 30;2014:715148. doi: 10.1155/2014/715148

Table 5.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of baseline fractalkine quartiles in the prediction of MetS and its components at year 2: ORs (n = 390).

ORs (95% CI) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P for trend
≤0.28 ng/mL 0.28–0.43 ng/mL 0.43–0.64 ng/mL >0.64 ng/mL
MetS
 Model 1 1 1.61 (0.73–3.52) 2.81 (1.17–6.74) 7.05 (2.26–18.00) <0.001
 Model 2 1 1.64 (0.75–3.63) 2.89 (1.19–6.98) 7.18 (2.28–18.59) <0.001
 Model 3 1 1.80 (0.79–4.10) 2.67 (1.08–6.59) 5.31 (1.65–14.09) 0.016
 Model 4 1 1.81 (0.79–4.16) 2.65 (1.06–6.61) 5.17 (1.60–13.74) 0.019
 Model 5 1 1.67 (0.75–3.73) 2.86 (1.17–6.99) 5.73 (1.79–14.34) 0.007
 Model 6 1 1.50 (0.66–3.40) 2.64 (1.06–6.56) 5.94 (1.85–15.09) 0.006
Central obesity
 Model 1 1 1.46 (0.75–2.84) 2.44 (1.19–4.99) 5.00 (2.17–11.50) <0.001
 Model 2 1 1.43 (0.73–2.80) 2.37 (1.15–4.87) 4.83 (2.09–11.19) <0.001
 Model 3 1 1.28 (0.62–2.65) 1.60 (0.73–3.48) 2.46 (0.99–6.03) 0.146
 Model 4 1 1.46 (0.69–3.06) 1.51 (0.72–2.99) 2.18 (0.95–6.01) 0.126
 Model 5 1 1.44 (0.73–2.84) 2.34 (1.13–4.84) 4.17 (1.78–9.79) 0.004
 Model 6 1 1.41 (0.72–2.80) 2.36 (1.14–4.91) 4.58 (1.96–10.72) 0.001
Elevated BP
 Model 1 1 0.54 (0.29–1.11) 1.10 (0.59–2.05) 1.08 (0.59–2.01) 0.069
 Model 2 1 0.53 (0.28–1.10) 1.09 (0.58–2.07) 1.03 (0.55–1.93) 0.078
 Model 3 1 0.54 (0.28–1.12) 1.03 (0.54–1.97) 0.86 (0.45–1.64) 0.150
 Model 4 1 0.49 (0.27–1.04) 0.94 (0.49–1.80) 0.77 (0.40–1.48) 0.118
 Model 5 1 0.53 (0.28–1.11) 1.08 (0.57–2.04) 0.90 (0.47–1.72) 0.105
 Model 6 1 0.52 (0.28–1.08) 1.05 (0.55–1.99) 0.95 (0.50–1.80) 0.085
Hyperglycemia
 Model 1 1 1.65 (0.82–3.32) 1.87 (0.92–3.79) 3.53 (1.60–7.81) 0.014
 Model 2 1 1.66 (0.82–3.35) 1.89 (0.93–3.83) 3.61 (1.63–8.02) 0.013
 Model 3 1 1.69 (0.83–3.43) 1.83 (0.90–3.74) 3.35 (1.49–7.55) 0.029
 Model 4a 1 1.71 (0.84–3.51) 1.86 (0.90–3.84) 3.40 (1.49–7.75) 0.029
 Model 5 1 1.68 (0.83–3.41) 1.84 (0.90–3.75) 3.07 (1.24–7.14) 0.071
 Model 6 1 1.69 (0.83–3.43) 1.92 (0.94–3.92) 3.57 (1.60–7.99) 0.016
Hypertriglyceridemiab
 Model 1 1 1.37 (0.71–2.64) 1.82 (0.93–3.55) 2.69 (1.33–5.44) 0.038
 Model 2 1 1.36 (0.70–2.62) 1.78 (0.91–3.50) 2.63 (1.30–5.34) 0.046
 Model 3 1 1.38 (0.71–2.68) 1.72 (0.87–3.38) 2.28 (1.01–4.69) 0.141
 Model 4 1 1.09 (0.55–2.17) 1.33 (0.65–2.69) 1.75 (0.83–3.71) 0.460
 Model 5 1 1.36 (0.70–2.63) 1.77 (0.90–3.47) 2.33 (1.03–4.79) 0.113
 Model 6 1 1.33 (0.67–2.63) 1.82 (0.91–3.64) 2.46 (1.19–5.11) 0.080
Low HDL-cb
 Model 1 1 0.84 (0.34–2.10) 0.93 (0.38–2.32) 1.51 (0.58–3.98) 0.595
 Model 2 1 0.86 (0.34–2.15) 0.96 (0.38–2.38) 1.59 (0.60–4.24) 0.550
 Model 3 1 0.86 (0.34–2.16) 0.95 (0.38–2.38) 1.50 (0.56–4.05) 0.665
 Model 4 1 0.92 (0.37–2.34) 1.04 (0.41–2.64) 1.69 (0.61–4.63) 0.603
 Model 5 1 0.85 (0.34–2.14) 0.96 (0.39–2.40) 1.64 (0.61–4.42) 0.532
 Model 6 1 0.92 (0.37–2.34) 1.05 (0.42–2.64) 1.78 (0.66–4.80) 0.502

OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex.

Model 2: further adjusted for education attainment, smoking, alcohol, and drinking based on model 1.

Model 3: further adjusted for visceral fat based on model 2.

Model 4: further adjusted for CRP based on model 3.

Model 5: further adjusted for HOMA-IR based on model 2; afor hyperglycemia: further adjusted for FINS based on model 2.

Model 6: further adjusted for TG and HDL-c based on model 2.

bNot adjusted for itself.

Abbreviations as in Table 1.