Skip to main content
. 2014 May 6;11:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-15

Table 3.

Effectiveness of exposure to drop-in center and outreach activities on safer injecting practices

 
Never shared needles or syringes in the past 3 months
Always kept a new needle on hand in the past 3 months
Program exposure
Pooled sample ( n = 823)
Matched sample ( n = 762)
Pooled sample ( n = 823)
Matched sample ( n = 762)
 
Bivariate
Multivariate
Bivariate
Multivariate
Bivariate
Multivariate
Bivariate
Multivariate
  OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Participated in DiC activities and outreach in the past 12 months
1.37 (0.61 to 3.09)
1.32 (0.59 to 2.99)
1.41 (0.58 to 3.42)
1.40 (0.57 to 3.40)
1.50* (1.05 to 2.14)
1.49* (1.05 to 2.14)
1.53* (1.07 to 2.19)
1.53* (1.07 to 2.19)
Participated in DiC activities only in the past 12 months
0.80 (0.40 to 1.61)
0.80 (0.40 to 1.62)
0.53 (0.26 to 1.09)
0.55 (0.27 to 1.13)
1.01 (0.71 to 1.45)
1.03 (0.71 to 1.47)
1.27 (0.87 to 1.83)
1.28 (0.88 to 1.85)
Participated in outreach only in the past 12 months 0.53 (0.22 to 1.33) 0.56 (0.22 to 1.39) 0.48 (0.19 to 1.23) 0.53 (0.21 to 1.37) 1.07 (0.62 to 1.85) 1.08 (0.62 to 1.88) 1.03 (0.59 to 1.79) 1.06 (0.61 to 1.86)

*Significant at p < 0.05. Age, gender, respondents' working hours, resident city, and ever use of MMT were matched for the CEM model. Covariates were ethnicity and education in the separated logistic regression models but not reported here.