Table 4.
Effectiveness of exposure to drop-in center and outreach activities on HIV testing
| |
Tested for HIV in the past 12 months |
Tested for HIV in the past 12 months |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Kunming) |
(Gejiu, Nanning, and Luzhai) |
||||||
|
Program exposure |
Pooled sample (
n
= 335) |
Matched sample (
n
= 324) |
Pooled sample (
n
= 699) |
Matched sample (
n
= 650) |
||||
| |
Bivariate |
Multivariate |
Bivariate |
Multivariate |
Bivariate |
Multivariate |
Bivariate |
Multivariate |
| OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
| Participated in DiC activities and outreach in the past 12 months |
3.51*** (1.80 to 6.85) |
3.50*** (1.79 to 6.86) |
2.79** (1.42 to 5.47) |
2.92** (1.47 to 5.78) |
2.96*** (1.74 to 5.01) |
2.74*** (1.67 to 4.86) |
1.82* (1.06 to 3.14) |
1.73 (1.00 to 2.99) |
| Participated in DiC activities only in the past 12 months |
1.44 (0.82 to 2.54) |
1.48 (0.84 to 2.62) |
1.08 (0.61 to 1.93) |
1.10 (0.62 to 1.98) |
2.03*** (1.39 to 2.95) |
2.17*** (1.48 to 3.19) |
1.05 (0.71 to 1.56) |
1.10 (0.73 to 1.62) |
| Participated in outreach only in the past 12 months | 0.53 (0.27 to 1.06) | 0.56 (0.28 to 1.12) | 0.44* (0.22 to 0.88) | 0.47* (0.23 to 0.95) | 5.80** (1.88 to 17.86) | 5.78** (1.87 to 17.89) | 3.64* (1.18 to 11.28) | 3.63* (1.17 to 11.28) |
*Significant at p < 0.05; **significant at p < 0.01; ***significant at p < 0.001. Age, gender, respondents' working hours, resident city, and ever use of MMT were matched for the CEM model. Covariates were ethnicity and education in the separated logistic regression models but not reported here.