Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 23;10:CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub4
Methods Randomised controlled trial of midwifery counselling to support women to stop smoking in pregnancy
Study conducted in a large UK maternity service. Data collection dates not specified
Participants Inclusion criteria: Pregnant and booked for maternity care; <18 weeks’ gestation; currently smoking 1 or more cigarettes/day
Practising midwives regularly attending antenatal clinic. 13 midwives selected for the intervention group and 13 for the control group
Exclusion criteria: Not specified.
Recruitment: All women identified as smokers in a busy teaching hospital with 3700 deliveries a year received a letter asking if they would like to participate. 100 women participated (described as ‘all 100 women contacted’) and were randomised (C = 50, I = 50)
Baseline characteristics: ‘Contemplators’ (C = 70%, I = 60%), ‘pre-contemplators’ (C = 15%, I = 22%), ‘ready for action’ (C = 15%, I = 18%)
No other baseline characteristics reported.
Progress+ coding: None.
Interventions Control: Usual care.
Intervention: Midwives were trained to assess the stages of change and provide a behavioural intervention, using the Health Education Authority material “Helping pregnant smokers quit: training for health professionals”, 1994
Main intervention strategy: Counselling (single intervention) compared to usual care.
Intensity: Frequency (C = 0, I = 5), duration (C = 0, I = 2)-based on estimated brief contact (< 5min) at a standard number of antenatal visits (8), as very little information about intervention provided. Usual care intensity: F = 0, I = 0
Intervention provided by existing staff: effectiveness study
Outcomes Self-reported smoking cessation at 37 weeks (late pregnancy)*; and at 4 weeks (0-5 months*) postpartum
Reduction in cigarettes/day; “stage of change” at 11 to 18 weeks vs 37 weeks. No biochemical validation of smoking status. Care providers’ views discussed
Notes No process evaluation reported.
Abstract data used. States ‘after one year’ which is assumed to be of year of the study, at 37 weeks’ gestation, as reported in figure one. As there were no quitters in the control group, the relapse rates of 4% within 1 month postpartum are assumed to be from the treatment group only
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as ‘randomly allocated’.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Low risk 94 of 100 randomised women followed up (reasons for attrition not reported). No ITT analysis reported. However, all drop-outs re-included as continuing smokers in this review
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All outcomes reported.
Other bias Low risk No other bias detected.
Biochemical validation of smoking abstinence (detection bias) High risk No biochemical validation of reported smoking status.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes
High risk Participants and personnel unlikely to be blinded to educational intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Not reported.
Incomplete implementation Unclear risk Not reported.
Equal baseline characteristics in study arms Unclear risk Not reported.
Contamination of control group Low risk Midwives randomised so low risk of contamination.