Methods | Randomised controlled trial of providing feedback on cotinine to support women to stop smoking in pregnancy and reduce low birthweight Study conducted in physicians offices and clinic sites within Maine (USA) from 1984 to 1987 |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women with a singleton live pregnancy; having maternal serum AFP screening at 15-20 weeks’ gestation; who smoked >= 10 cigarettes a day Exclusion criteria: Not further specified. Recruitment: Physicians approached (no consent from women). 25,628 women completed maternal serum screening form, 97% answered question on smoking and 17% smoked >= 10 cigs/day. 2848 women were randomised (C = 1425, I = 1423) Baseline characteristics: Mean cigs/day at baseline: C = 16.3, I = 16.1 Maternal education (mean years): C = 11.8, I = 11.9. Progress+ coding: None. |
|
Interventions |
Control: Standard medical care not otherwise specified. Intervention: Report on cotinine generated for her physician with interpretation relating smoking level to birthweight. Physician explained this to the woman and also gave her a copy of the report and a pregnancy-specific booklet about how to quit, using the cotinine information also + repeat measure 1 month later, 2 copies to physician, comparison of 1st and 2nd cotinine, report commenting on the change and its interpretation Main intervention strategy: Feedback (multiple intervention) compared to usual care Intensity: Frequency (C = 0, I = 3), Duration (C = 0, I = 2). Usual care intensity: F = 0, I = 0 Intervention provided by existing staff: Effectiveness study |
|
Outcomes | No smoking cessation data. Smoking data limited to comparability at first assessment and mean serum cotinine levels, which could not be included as they are disaggregated by low and high study site participation Mean birthweight*; low* and very low* birthweight; preterm birth* (< 37 weeks); stillbirths (> 20 weeks)*; neonatal deaths*; postneonatal deaths |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer-generated random numbers. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Information not provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
High risk | 2700/2848 (94.8%) included in analysis. 3% lost to follow-up and 2% multiple gestations or fetal deaths. Only 695/1343 (48%) women in the intervention groups provided repeat serum cotinine for comparison. No ITT analysis. No smoking outcomes reported and unable to re-include data for mean cotinine and birth outcomes |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Results difficult to interpret. Smoking cessation not recorded |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias detected. |
Biochemical validation of smoking abstinence (detection bias) | High risk | Serum cotinine measurement at baseline for both the experimental and comparison groups but it was not clear that any follow-up measurements were made for the comparison group |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes |
High risk | Caregivers aware of group allocation. Experimental group given feedback on serum cotinine levels |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Incomplete implementation | High risk | Process evaluation showed less than good implementation with differential impact on perinatal outcome by completeness with second blood samples taken for cotinine measurement |
Equal baseline characteristics in study arms | Unclear risk | Intervention groups similar at trial entry. |
Contamination of control group | Low risk | Intervention not provided by care provider. |