Methods | Cluster-randomised controlled trial of brief GP counselling to support women to stop smoking in pregnancy and prevent relapse postpartum Study conducted in Western Norway from November 1986 to November 1987 |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria: No indications of serious social or medical problems, living with a partner, and smoking at least 5 cigarettes per day before pregnancy and still smoking at least 1 cigarette per day at the first checkup Exclusion criteria: Not further specified. Recruitment: All 398 GPs in western Norway were invited by mail to participate in the study. 187 participating GPs were asked to recruit 4 pregnant and 4 non-pregnant women for the study, at the first checkup in the first trimester. 1/3 pregnant and non-pregnant women ended up in control groups. The GPs who recruited pregnant women for the intervention groups recruited non-pregnant women for the control groups. 2379 pregnant women screened, 674 fulfilled inclusion criteria, 144 refused to participate (21%). 530 pregnant women were randomised (unclear how many each group) Baseline characteristics: Mean age starting smoking 27.6, mean cigs per day = 9.5. Mean age 25.9. 18-34 years of age, all living with a partner Progress+ coding: None. |
|
Interventions |
Control: Ordinary control programme during pregnancy and for first year after delivery (usual care) Intervention: (i) < 15 mins GP consultation at initial visit about hazards of smoking, how to stop and how to avoid relapse; (ii) information about problems related to ‘the smoking fetus’; (iii) delivered with aid of a 5-page ‘flip-over’; (iv) 8-page booklet. Women invited to consult their GPs after 1, 6, 12 and 18 months to discuss their smoking habits Main intervention strategy: Counselling (multiple intervention) compared with usual care Intensity: Frequency (C = 0, I = 3), Duration (C = 0, I = 1). Usual care intensity: F = 0, D = 0 Intervention provided by existing staff (GPs): Effectiveness study |
|
Outcomes | Self-reported abstinence 6 months after study entry (late pregnancy*), biochemically validated at 12 months after study entry (0-5 months postpartum*), self-reported abstinence 15 (6-11 months postpartum*) and 18 months after study entry (12-17 months postpartum*) Sef-reported reduction and increase in smoking. An associated reference (Haug 1992) reports results of a survey of GPs delivering the intervention |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | GPs described as randomly allocated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
High risk | 180/530 dropped out due to spontaneous abortions (24), serious complications (8), moved to another district (31) or for other unknown reasons (117). Only 350/530 (C = 98, I = 252) included in analysis and we were unable to re-include those lost to follow-up for other reasons in this review as they were not reported by group allocation. Further dropouts not explained (C = 97 and I = 244 in outcome tables-re-included in this review as continuing smokers) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Not clear if biochemically validated outcomes reported. |
Other bias | High risk | Unequal recruitment to study arms (higher recruitment in intervention arms) |
Biochemical validation of smoking abstinence (detection bias) | High risk | Biochemical validation of smoking only at study entry and after 12 months (urinary thiocynate). Unclear if those who had high thiocynate levels were considered smokers. No cut-off levels reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes |
High risk | Not feasible to blind participants and personnel to counselling intervention |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Incomplete implementation | High risk | 59% residents did not document consultation. 1 component dropped |
Equal baseline characteristics in study arms | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Contamination of control group | High risk | Same providers asked to provide control and intervention arms for pregnant and non-pregnant women |