Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 23;10:CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub4
Methods Cluster-randomised controlled trial of brief GP counselling to support women to stop smoking in pregnancy and prevent relapse postpartum
Study conducted in Western Norway from November 1986 to November 1987
Participants Inclusion criteria: No indications of serious social or medical problems, living with a partner, and smoking at least 5 cigarettes per day before pregnancy and still smoking at least 1 cigarette per day at the first checkup
Exclusion criteria: Not further specified.
Recruitment: All 398 GPs in western Norway were invited by mail to participate in the study. 187 participating GPs were asked to recruit 4 pregnant and 4 non-pregnant women for the study, at the first checkup in the first trimester. 1/3 pregnant and non-pregnant women ended up in control groups. The GPs who recruited pregnant women for the intervention groups recruited non-pregnant women for the control groups. 2379 pregnant women screened, 674 fulfilled inclusion criteria, 144 refused to participate (21%). 530 pregnant women were randomised (unclear how many each group)
Baseline characteristics: Mean age starting smoking 27.6, mean cigs per day = 9.5.
Mean age 25.9. 18-34 years of age, all living with a partner
Progress+ coding: None.
Interventions Control: Ordinary control programme during pregnancy and for first year after delivery (usual care)
Intervention: (i) < 15 mins GP consultation at initial visit about hazards of smoking, how to stop and how to avoid relapse; (ii) information about problems related to ‘the smoking fetus’; (iii) delivered with aid of a 5-page ‘flip-over’; (iv) 8-page booklet. Women invited to consult their GPs after 1, 6, 12 and 18 months to discuss their smoking habits
Main intervention strategy: Counselling (multiple intervention) compared with usual care
Intensity: Frequency (C = 0, I = 3), Duration (C = 0, I = 1). Usual care intensity: F = 0, D = 0
Intervention provided by existing staff (GPs): Effectiveness study
Outcomes Self-reported abstinence 6 months after study entry (late pregnancy*), biochemically validated at 12 months after study entry (0-5 months postpartum*), self-reported abstinence 15 (6-11 months postpartum*) and 18 months after study entry (12-17 months postpartum*)
Sef-reported reduction and increase in smoking.
An associated reference (Haug 1992) reports results of a survey of GPs delivering the intervention
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk GPs described as randomly allocated.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
High risk 180/530 dropped out due to spontaneous abortions (24), serious complications (8), moved to another district (31) or for other unknown reasons (117). Only 350/530 (C = 98, I = 252) included in analysis and we were unable to re-include those lost to follow-up for other reasons in this review as they were not reported by group allocation. Further dropouts not explained (C = 97 and I = 244 in outcome tables-re-included in this review as continuing smokers)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Not clear if biochemically validated outcomes reported.
Other bias High risk Unequal recruitment to study arms (higher recruitment in intervention arms)
Biochemical validation of smoking abstinence (detection bias) High risk Biochemical validation of smoking only at study entry and after 12 months (urinary thiocynate). Unclear if those who had high thiocynate levels were considered smokers. No cut-off levels reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes
High risk Not feasible to blind participants and personnel to counselling intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Not reported.
Incomplete implementation High risk 59% residents did not document consultation. 1 component dropped
Equal baseline characteristics in study arms Unclear risk Not reported.
Contamination of control group High risk Same providers asked to provide control and intervention arms for pregnant and non-pregnant women