Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 23;10:CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub4
Methods Quasi-randomised trial of a self-help manual to support women to stop smoking in pregnancy
Study conducted in public health maternity clinics in Gothenburg, Sweden, with data collection from 1987 to 1988
Participants Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women registered as daily smokers (at least 1 cigarette per day), gestational age less than 12 weeks, and speak Swedish
Exclusion criteria: Not further specified.
Recruitment: 13/14 public health clinics participated. Women born days 1-10 of each month were allocated to the control group and women born on days 11-31 were allocated to the intervention group. Unequal group sizes were allocated as it was expected more intervention women would refuse to participate. 723 eligible continuing smokers were randomised (C = 231, I = 492). 417/492 (85%) of the intervention group agreed to participate, and the control group were not asked for consent
Baseline characteristics: Mean cigs/day 16.8. Mean age 28.4 years.
Progress+ coding: None.
Interventions Control: Given an information sheet by their doctor with basic facts about smoking and pregnancy, as included in the last pages of the self-help manual
Intervention: Given a self-help manual on stopping smoking, based on Windsor 1985. The manual was revised and pilot tested. The manual contained 2 phases, a preparatory (one week) and cessation phase. The smoker was given new assignments every day to the quit day and the tasks were based on the principle of behaviour therapy. The cessation period was followed for the first 5 days with new information daily
Main intervention strategy: Health education (single intervention) compared to less intensive intervention
Intensity: Frequency (C = 1, I=1), Duration (C = 1, I = 1).
Intervention provided by existing staff (obstetrician provided self-help manual): Effectiveness study
Outcomes Biochemically validated smoking cessation at 30-34 weeks’ gestation (late pregnancy*), 8 weeks postpartum (0-5 months), mean birthweight*, preterm births* (< 36 wks), low birthweight babies*, mean cigarettes per day at 30-34 weeks’ gestation among baseline smokers*. Mean cigarettes per day at baseline, week 12-14, week 30-34 among all randomised women, 8 weeks after delivery among baseline smokers and all randomised women
Notes SDs for mean birthweight were not reported, therefore we calculated a mean SD from 13 studies with available birthweight SDs (578) to include in this review, as recommended by the cochrane handbook.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Allocation by birth date is not random sequence. However, this study was included as interference is unlikely with birth dates
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Allocation would not be concealed as allocated by birth dates (days 1-10 = control, days 11-31 = intervention)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Loss to follow-up from miscarriage and moving out of district (C = 10% or 23, I = 11% or 46), not included in analysis. However, all other dropouts included as continuing smokers
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All primary outcomes appear to be reported.
Other bias High risk Unclear why there are 444 in intervention group and 209 in control group, when report states 10% of 231 were excluded and 11% of 492 were excluded
Biochemical validation of smoking abstinence (detection bias) Low risk Biochemical validation of smoking status using serum thiocynate (100 ng/mL)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes
High risk Participants and personnel unlikely to be blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Not reported.
Incomplete implementation Unclear risk Manual given to all women who agreed to participate (85% of total assigned to intervention - i.e. 15% refused to participate)
Equal baseline characteristics in study arms Unclear risk Only age and mean no of cigarettes reported.
Contamination of control group Low risk Unlikely control group would accidentally be given the self-help manual