Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014 Mar 28;197:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2014.03.005

Table 4.

Summary of mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI; mL/sec ± SEM) during baseline, hypoxia (HX), hypercapnia (HC) and hypoxia + hypercapnia (HX + HC) in all treatment groups. Groups were: Sham (WT: n=8; MT: n=9), PCPA (WT: n=3; MT: n=3), PCPA + Methy (WT: n=3; MT: n=3), MSX-3 (WT: n=3; MT: n=3), PCPA + MSX-3 (WT: n=3; MT: n=3), and Apo + MSX-3 + Methy (WT: n=3; MT: n=3). Significance was accepted at p < 0.05; 3 = Sham MT vs. treatment group MT.

Mean Inspiratory Flow Baseline HX HC HX + HC
Sham WT 13 ± 4 18 ± 4 26 ± 6 29 ± 7
Sham MT 9 ± 0.6 16 ± 2 23 ± 3 24 ± 3
PCPA WT 16 ± 4 17 ± 4 26 ± 5 28 ± 6
PCPA MT 12 ± 0.5 14 ± 0.4 27 ± 2 27 ± 3
PCPA + Methy WT 14 ± 1 16 ± 1 32 ± 2 31 ± 2
PCPA + Methy MT 13 ± 1 15 ± 2 31 ± 2 32 ± 1
MSX-3 WT 17 ± 1 18 ± 0.6 27 ± 0.2 28 ± 0.6
MSX-3 MT 14 ± 2 15 ± 0.8 26 ± 1 28 ± 2
MSX-3 + PCPA WT 19 ± 2 18 ± 1 33 ± 1 33 ± 1
MSX-3 + PCPA MT 18 ± 0.8 17 ± 0.2 33 ± 1 34 ± 0.8
Apocynin + MSX-3 + Methy WT 18 ± 0.4 22 ± 1 37 ± 2 37 ± 3
Apocynin + MSX-3 + Methy MT 16 ± 2 18 ± 0.8 36 ± 43 39 ± 43