Table 2.

FAN process evaluation logic model and overview of variables used in mediation analysis.

	Inputs	Activities	Implementation/organizational outcomes	Behavioral determinants	Behavior change
Chain of events logic model	With the guidance of the planning committee, FAN will provide training, TA and follow up consultation to FAN committees and pastors which will	Facilitate the development of knowledge, confidence, and skills among FAN Committee members and church cooks to create a healthier church environment which, with the pastors and elders active support, will	Result in the FAN committees using healthy church criteria (i.e., core elements for PA and healthy eating) to plan and put in place relevant and enjoyable opportunities for PA and healthy eating, provide health-promoting messages, and enlist pastor support for PA and healthy eating in their churches, which will	Result in changes in learning, attitudes and skills among AME members which will	Result in AME members meeting recommendations for PA and following guidelines for DASH diet
Measures	Process: Dose delivered Documentation of activities; staff records [not reported here]	Process: Dose received -Training evaluation -End-of-year interview with Fan coordinator -FAN Staff rating [not reported here]	Process: Fidelity -Organizational assessment -Member survey (congregant self-reported exposure) -FAN Staff rating -End-of-year interview with FAN coordinator (implementation) -Food and Media observations	Individual Behavior Mediators -Social support -Self efficacy	Individual Behavior Outcomes Self-report Physical activity and Fruit and Vegetable intake measures

Adapted from Wilcox et al. (2010).

Note: Highlighted measures used in mediation analyses. Shaded portion depicts project elements evaluated with process evaluation.