Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Feb 24;33(12):2733–2745. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.01.010

Table 1.

Imaging modalities available at each time point (year). SPARE-CD uses time points 1 through 9; PiB analysis uses available data at later time points. N = number of subjects. CVLT scores were computed only from the imaging data used to train/test the classifier, that is, subjects and time points for which MRI or [15O] PET-CBF data were available

Year N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
MRI 143 98% 85% 84% 77% 76% 72% 69% 62% 55%
PET 137 98% 87% 83% 77% 77% 67% 66% 61% 55%
CVLT 143 98% 85% 84% 77% 76% 72% 69% 62% 55%
PiB 66 2% 2% 2% 5% 9% 26% 64% 23% 20% 3%