Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Feb 24;33(12):2733–2745. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.01.010

Table 2.

Group demographics. Age, CVLT, and MMSE for CS and CD shown as “mean (SD) of first year, mean (SD) of last year”

CS CD MRI and PET-CBF PiB PET
Number of subjects 25 25 137 66
Number of men 11 17 77 37
Number of visits, mean (SD) 7.5 (1.9) 8.0 (1.4) 6.7 (2.7) 1.5 (0.7)
Age, mean (SD) 65.8 (6.2),a 73.3 (7.3) 70.4 (7.0), 77.8 (6.3)a 72.8 (7.7) 79.6 (7.0)
CVLT slope, mean (SD) 1.1 (0.4) −0.8 (0.4) 0.1 (0.7) 0.2 (0.6)
CVLT, mean (SD) 54.2 (10.2),a 67.3 (10.0) 52.2 (11.0), 43.3 (8.5)a 54.1 (10.7), 54.9 (12.2) 53.7 (15.2)
MMSE, mean (SD) 28.9 (1.6),a 29.5 (0.9) 29.0 (1.1), 28.2 (1.7)a 28.9 (1.3), 28.8 (1.3) 28.8 (1.6)
APOE ε4, with/without/unknown 8/15/2 5/19/1 38/91/8 20/42/4

Five additional subjects were available for the MRI data alone. Mean CVLT and MMSE for [11C] PiB PET were calculated in the same fashion as mean DVR, that is, scores from all available years for one subject were averaged to obtain one score per subject, and then those scores were averaged over all subjects.

Key: SD, standard deviation.

a

This group (first-year data or last-year data) included in training set.