Skip to main content
. 2014 May 8;15:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-55

Table 3.

Genomic information for 29 functional genetic units (FGUs) (17 single loci and 12 association groups or AGs) for seedling cold tolerance (CT) detected by χ 2 tests (single loci) and multi-locus linkage disequilibrium analyses in 30 cold-tolerant introgression lines (ILs) selected from four BC 2 F 2 populations derived from crosses between the recurrent parent (C418) and four donors (ZH100, Bg300, Cis, and MNTH)

Population (code) χ 2 test
Z -test 4
QTL ref.
AG 1 Bin Marker IF 2 FG 3 P -value BC 2 F 2 individual P -value
C418/ZH100 (A)
 
7.1
RM4584
0.917
1.000
3.4 × 10−14
 
 
 
AG A1
1.11
RM1196
0.583
0.833
2.2 × 10−4
 
 
[11,13]
AG A1
1.15
RM1297
0.500
0.833
1.1 × 10−4
 
 
[7,9,16]
AG A1
4.12
RM2521
0.750
0.833
5.1 × 10−9
 
 
[7]
AG A1
9.6
RM1896
0.750
0.833
5.1 × 10−9
 
 
 
AG A2
6.3
RM5754
0.417
0.667
8.7 × 10−3
A-IL5
0.0228
[9]
AG A2
6.15
RM5463
0.500
0.667
4.5 × 10−3
A-IL5
0.0228
[9,14,16,17]
 
7.9
RM6835
0.500
0.833
4.5 × 10−3
 
 
[11,17]
 
7.12
RM5847
0.583
0.833
2.2 × 10−4
 
 
 
C418/Bg300 (B)
AG B1
2.6
RM324
0.500
1.000
7.6 × 10−10
 
 
 
AG B1
5.10
RM164
0.583
1.000
3.1 × 10−7
B-IL5
0.0416
[10]
AG B1
12.5
RM101
0.583
1.000
3.1 × 10−7
 
 
[1,9]
AG B2
2.4
RM145
0.500
0.833
1.1 × 10−4
 
 
[7]
AG B2
2.11
RM262
0.500
0.833
1.1 × 10−4
 
 
[11,13,17]
AG B2
7.10
RM432
0.417
0.833
1.0 × 10−6
 
 
[11,17]
AG B2
8.2
RM38
0.417
0.833
1.0 × 10−6
 
 
[13]
AG B3
3.5
RM7
0.500
0.833
1.1 × 10−4
B-IL1
0.0368
[7]
AG B3
6.3
RM253
0.583
0.833
2.2 × 10−4
 
 
[9]
AG B3
9.9
RM257
0.500
0.833
1.1 × 10−4
 
 
[10,16]
AG B4
1.5
RM579
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
B-IL4
0.0289
[13,14,17]
AG B4
3.12
RM6832
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
B-IL5
0.0416
[12]
AG B4
5.15
RM334
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
 
 
 
AG B4
6.12
RM275
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
B-IL5
0.0072
[9,14,16,17]
AG B4
10.3
RM216
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
B-IL4/B-IL5
0.0289/0.0072
[9]
AG B4
10.9
RM1375
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
B-IL4
0.0480
[10,16]
AG B4
11.14
RM224
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
B-IL4/B-IL5
0.0082/0.0416
 
 
8.14
RM447
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
 
 
[9,11,16]
 
12.2
RM247
0.333
0.667
3.1 × 10−4
 
 
 
C418/Cis (C)
 
7.2
RM5711
0.538
1.000
2.1 × 10−17
 
 
 
AG C1
6.15
RM3307
0.577
0.846
8.3 × 10−9
 
 
[9,14,16,17]
AG C1
10.9
RM1873
0.577
0.846
8.3 × 10−9
 
 
[10,16]
 
12.1
RM6973
0.385
0.692
4.7 × 10−7
 
 
 
 
2.18
RM3850
0.308
0.615
5.7 × 10−7
 
 
 
 
6.3
RM5754
0.539
0.923
2.3 × 10−12
C-IL2
0.0041
[9]
AG C2
3.8
RM6959
0.423
0.769
3.5 × 10−9
 
 
 
AG C2
3.16
RM3199
0.423
0.769
3.5 × 10−9
C-IL1
0.0228
 
AG C2
9.1
RM3609
0.538
0.769
3.6 × 10−7
C-IL2
0.0055
 
 
4.17
RM6238
0.462
0.692
1.0 × 10−7
 
 
[9]
 
4.12
RM2521
0.308
0.538
1.0 × 10−3
 
 
[7]
 
11.10
RM5349
0.308
0.615
5.7 × 10−7
 
 
[12,17]
 
3.2
RM3126
0.654
0.923
3.7 × 10−11
 
 
 
 
3.18
RM3329
0.346
0.538
3.1 × 10−5
C-IL3
0.0283
[9]
AG C3
7.8
RM5875
0.500
0.769
4.8 × 10−7
 
 
[11,17]
AG C3
8.2
RM1148
0.462
0.769
1.0 × 10−7
 
 
[13]
AG C4
2.12
RM3688
0.346
0.615
3.1 × 10−5
C-IL2
0.0055
[11,13,17]
AG C4
11.4
RM3133
0.308
0.615
5.7 × 10−7
 
 
 
 
5.1
RM1200
0.308
0.615
5.7 × 10−7
 
 
[17]
 
2.4
RM5459
0.462
0.615
7.8 × 10−5
 
 
[7]
C418/MNTH (D) AG D1
4.3
RM3658
0.700
1.000
1.5 × 10−5
 
 
[9,18]
AG D1
9.9
RM6235
0.500
1.000
2.5 × 10−8
 
 
[10,16]
AG D2
6.12
RM6298
0.400
0.800
3.0 × 10−5
 
 
[9,14,16,17]
AG D2
7.5
RM5436
0.400
0.800
3.0 × 10−5
 
 
[17]
AG D2
9.3
RM5899
0.600
0.800
7.3 × 10−4
 
 
 
AG D2
10.10
RM1146
0.600
0.800
7.3 × 10−4
 
 
[10,16]
AG D2
11.2
RM1812
0.400
0.800
3.0 × 10−5
 
 
 
AG D2
11.9
RM1355
0.400
0.800
3.0 × 10−5
 
 
[12,17]
  5.12 RM5970 0.400 0.800 3.0 × 10−5 D-IL5 0.0416 [10]

1An AG is defined as a group of unlinked but perfectly associated loci showing equal introgression in selected cold-tolerant ILs from each BC population as detected by linkage disequilibrium analysis [28].

2IF = introgression (donor) allelic frequency.

3FG is the frequency of functional genotypes (donor homozygote and the heterozygote).

4Two-sample Z tests to compare the proportions of two groups of BC2F6 ILs derived from the same BC2F2 individual but with significantly different CT phenotypes (SP) was performed using SAS [27].