Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 29;111(19):E1950–E1959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406161111

Table 2.

Correlation analysis of gating pore residues

Position WW KD HH MF SA Vol
V236 V1/2 −0.04 0.02 −0.11 0.26 −0.05 −0.16
TA −0.04 0.52 0.44 0.16 0.05 0.23
TD 0.30 0.62* 0.59* 0.34 0.21 0.38
I237 V1/2 −0.86*** −0.89*** −0.89*** −0.83*** −0.15 −0.29
TA −0.62* −0.22 −0.45 −0.26 0.14 0.38
TD 0.13 0.48 0.33 0.28 −0.28 0.12
S240 V1/2 0.68* 0.18 0.27 0.51 0.90*** 0.85***
TA 0.24 −0.09 0.03 −0.06 0.54* 0.45
TD 0.64 0.44 0.58 0.53 0.44 0.23
I241 V1/2 −0.23 −0.44 −0.40 −0.33 −0.26 −0.38
TA 0.05 0.22 0.29 0.06 −0.44 −0.58*
TD −0.31 0.26 0.08 −0.10 −0.51 −0.54*
F244 V1/2 −0.79*** −0.01 −0.23 −0.46 −0.78** −0.64*
TA 0.16 −0.20 −0.11 0.08 0.26 0.21
TD 0.08 0.13 0.11 0.28 0.29 0.39
C286 V1/2 0.13 −0.43 −0.42 0.00 0.52 0.24
TA 0.38 0.63* 0.53 0.45 0.39 0.55
TD 0.12 0.66* 0.43 0.53 −0.11 0.11
I287 V1/2 0.55* −0.04 0.28 0.32 0.44 0.36
TA 0.39 0.41 0.44 0.48 0.25 0.05
TD 0.50 0.59* 0.61* 0.71** 0.54* 0.59*
F290 V2 −0.79*** −0.11 −0.35 −0.47 −0.65* −0.57*
TA −0.07 −0.32 −0.42 −0.20 0.31 0.35
TD 0.84*** −0.19 0.03 0.24 0.78*** 0.69**
A319 V1/2 0.24 −0.46 −0.41 −0.10 0.20 0.13
TA −0.05 0.24 0.18 0.31 −0.28 −0.18
TD 0.21 0.54 0.57 0.27 −0.10 0.01
I320 V1/2 0.03 −0.50 −0.35 −0.33 −0.09 −0.26
TA −0.24 −0.36 −0.24 −0.48 −0.61 −0.78*
TD −0.01 0.12 0.18 0.06 −0.35 −0.30

The table indicates the Pearson pairwise correlation coefficient between each measured gating parameter (TA, TD, and V1/2) and each tested side-chain physicochemical parameter: HH, KD, WW, MF, vdW surface area (SA), and volume (Vol), for each gating pore residue. The MF and HH scales were inverted such that more positive values indicate more hydrophobic residues in all hydrophobicity scales. The F290 mutants display bisigmoid Q–V curves; hence the second component V2 is used instead of V1/2 (Results and Discussion). The number of asterisks indicates the statistical significance as follows: *0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, **0.001 ≤ P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.