Skip to main content
. 2014 May 14;4(5):e004552corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004552corr1

Table 2.

Comparison of the proportion of positive cases in each group

Pathological features IBM+RV PAM IBM+RV vs PAM
IBM - RV PM&DM IBM - RV vs PM&DM
IBM+RV vs IBM - RV
n (%) n (%) Sensitivity Specificity n (%) n (%) Sensitivity Specificity p value
Number of cases 15 (100) 7 (100) 9 (100) 11 (100)
Aggregated proteins, n (%)
 p62 15 (100) 6 (86) 1.00 0.14 4 (44) 3 (27)* 0.44 0.73 0.003†
 TDP-43 13 (87) 5 (71) 0.87 0.29 1 (11) 2 (18)* 0.11 0.82 0.001†
 Ubiquitin 11 (73) 4 (57) 0.73 0.43 0 (0) 3 (27)* 0.00 0.73 0.001†
 Myotilin 10 (67) 5 (71) 0.67 0.29 0 (0) 9 (82) 0.00 0.18 0.002†
 Congophilic deposits 13 (87) 7 (100) 0.87 0.00 1 (11) 0 (0) 0.11 1.00 0.001†
COX−/SDH+ fibres‡, n (%)
 Any 12 (86) 2 (29) 0.86 0.71 9 (100) 3 (27) 1.00 0.73 0.50
Inflammatory features, n (%)
 MHC class I upregulation 15 (100) 3 (43) 1.00 0.57 9 (100) 11 (100) 1.00 0.00 1.00
 Strong MHC class I upregulation 14 (93) 0 (0) 0.93 1.00 7 (78) 10 (91) 0.78 0.09 0.53
 Partial invasion 10 (67) 0 (0) 0.67 1.00 3 (33) 2 (18) 0.33 0.82 0.21
 Endomysial CD3 T-cell score >1 13 (87) 0 (0) 0.87 1.00 4 (44) 7 (64) 0.44 0.36 0.06
 Endomysial CD4 T-cell score >1 12 (80) 0 (0) 0.80 1.00 2 (22) 5 (45) 0.22 0.54 0.01†
 Endomysial CD8 T-cell score >0 14 (93) 0 (0) 0.93 1.00 7 (78) 9 (82) 0.78 0.18 0.53
 Endomysial CD68 macrophage score >1 12 (80) 0 (0) 0.80 1.00 4 (44) 8 (73) 0.44 0.27 0.10

*Pathological features present in DM, but not PM cases.

†Statistically significant results.

‡In IBM with rimmed vacuoles n=14.

COX, cytochrome oxidase; IBM, inclusion body myositis; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; PAM, protein accumulation myopathies with rimmed vacuoles; PM&DM, steroid-responsive inflammatory myopathies; RV, rimmed vacuoles; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; TDP-43, transactivation response DNA binding protein-43.