Table 1. Relevant Substantive Provisions of the AIAa.
§3—“First Inventor to File” | This converts the U.S. patent system from first-to-invent to modified first-to-file. |
§4—“Inventor's Oath” | This lowers the burden where an inventor is unable or refuses to sign and allows by assignee. |
§5—Prior User Rights | Prior user defense is broadened for good faith commercial use at least 1 year before filing, with a University Exception. |
§6—Post-Grant Review and Interpartes review | Post-grant review (PGR) is available within the first 9 months after the patent issues, inter partes review afterward. Both reviews are to be completed within 1 year. PGR can be based on any grounds or on a “novel or unsettled legal question.” Inter partes review is only on prior art patents and publications. The patent owner has an opportunity to amend the claims and provide evidence and comments, and the challenger can file written comments. The challenger must prove unpatentability by a preponderance of the evidence and is precluded in future proceedings from arguing any ground that could have been raised here. |
§8—3rd Party Submissions | Third parties may submit art to the USPTO, and it will be considered if submitted before the earlier of (1) the date of a notice of allowance or (2) 6 months from publication or first rejection. |
§12—Supplemental Exam | A postissuance mechanism to cure prosecution defects to avoid charges of inequitable conduct. |
§15—Best Mode | Failure to disclose best mode is no longer a basis for invalidity, although still required during prosecution. |
§16—Marking | Marking of products with patent numbers may be virtual. |
§17—Advice of Counsel | Failure to obtain advice of counsel cannot be used to prove willfulness of infringement. |
§33—Human organisms | Prohibition of patent claims directed to, or encompassing, human organsms. |
The remaining provisions deal largely with fee setting, venue and jurisdiction, and studies.