Table 3.
Zero-drink hurdle model | Low risk drinking hurdle model | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Effect | OR[95%CI] | RR[95%CI] | OR[95%CI] | RR[95%CI] |
ACA Main Effect | 1.08[0.84,1.69] | 1.08[0.85,1.31] | 1.08[0.57,1.58] | 0.84[0.46,1.23] |
NTX Main Effect | 1.35[1.06,1.65]* | 0.86[0.67,1.04]# | 1.99[1.07,2.90]* | 0.54[0.30,0.79]* |
CBI Main Effect | 1.15[0.90,1.41] | 1.14[0.89,1.38] | 1.57[0.84,2.30] | 0.88[0.47,1.29] |
ACA+NTX vs PLB ACA+PLB NTX | 1.46[1.00,1.91]* | 0.93[0.65,1.21] | 2.21[0.79,3.63] | 0.47[0.17,0.76]* |
ACA+ PLB NTX vs PLB ACA+PLB NTX | 1.09[0.76,1.43] | 0.97[0.68,1.27] | 1.02[0.37,1.68] | 0.81[0.30,1.32] |
PLB ACA+ NTX vs PLB ACA+PLB NTX | 1.38[0.95,1.80] | 0.76[0.53,0.99]* | 1.84[0.66,3.03] | 0.52[0.19,0.85]* |
ACA+CBI vs PLB ACA+no CBI | 1.24[0.86,1.62] | 1.22]0.85,1.59] | 1.65[0.58,2.71] | 0.75[0.26,1.24] |
ACA+no CBI vs PLB ACA+no CBI | 1.13[0.78,1.47] | 1.00[0.69,1.31] | 1.17[0.40,1.94] | 0.77[0.26,1.28] |
PLB ACA+CBI vs PLB ACA vs no CBI | 1.21[0.83,1.58] | 1.06[0.74,1.38] | 1.74[0.62,2.86] | 0.81[0.29,1.33] |
NTX+CBI vs PLB NTX+no CBI | 1.49[1.03,1.96]* | 0.97[0.68,1.27] | 2.45[0.93,3.96] | 0.55[0.21,0.90]* |
NTX+no CBI vs PLB NTX+no CBI | 1.87[1.29,2.46]* | 0.91[0.63,1.18] | 3.26[1.21,5.31]* | 0.32[0.12,0.52]* |
PLB NTX+CBI vs PLB NTX+no CBI | 1.56[1.08,2.05]* | 1.20[0.83,1.56] | 2.36[0.90,3.82] | 0.61[0.23,0.98]* |
Indicates significance at p<0.05 and
indicates p<0.10.