Table 3.
Category | Panel a: Children's Recall and Narratives at Session 1 | Panel b: Correlations with Maternal Narrative Variables at Session 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Mean | SD | Range | Elaboration Ratio | Deflections | |
Proportion of events recalled | 0.83 | 0.22 | (0–1) | .36** | .26* |
Total propositions | 15.96 | 7.38 | 4.50–44.33 | .07 | .54** |
Total content | 8.08 | 4.20 | 2.00–23.17 | .35** | .35** |
Breadth | 3.59 | 1.09 | 1–6.00 | .36** | .30** |
Who | 1.23 | 0.89 | 0–3.67 | −.12 | .02 |
What-object | 2.04 | 1.32 | 0–8.67 | .37** | .30* |
What-action | 1.52 | 1.06 | 0–4.50 | .34** | .41** |
Where | 1.10 | 0.68 | 0–3.00 | .31** | .35** |
When | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0–1.83 | .15 | .18 |
Why | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0–1.50 | .28* | .07 |
How-description | 1.47 | 1.17 | 0–6.50 | .30** | .25* |
How-evaluation | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0–1.80 | .23* | .17 |
Note:
p < .05;
p < .01.
Correlations based on 79 dyads (excluding 2 mother-father-child triads, and 2 dyads in which the child failed to recall any of the events); all correlations .35 and higher remained significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.