Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 12;15(5):496–503. doi: 10.4161/cbt.28020

Table 4. Correlation between KRAS mutation/KRAS overexpression and EGFR expression in CTC.

  KRAS CTC Total
Wild type Mutated
EGFR CTC Negative Count 7 1 8
% within EGFR CTC 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
% within KRAS CTC 28.0% 14.3% 25.0%
% of total 21.9% 3.1% 25.0%
Positive Count 18 6 24
% within EGFR CTC 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
% within KRAS CTC 72.0% 85.7% 75.0%
% of total 56.2% 18.8% 75.0%
Total Count 25 7 32
% within EGFR CTC 78.1% 21.9% 100.0%
% within KRAS CTC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of total 78.1% 21.9% 100.0%
  K-RAS CTC Total
Negative Positive
EGFR CTC Negative Count 3 5 8
% within EGFR CTC 37.5% 62.5% 100.0%
% within KRAS overexpression CTC 16.7% 35.7% 25.0%
% of total 9.4% 15.6% 25.0%
Positive Count 15 9 24
% within EGFR CTC 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
% within KRAS overexpression CTC 83.3% 64.3% 75.0%
% of total 46.9% 28.1% 75.0%
Total Count 18 14 32
% within EGFR CTC 56.2% 43.8% 100.0%
% within KRAS overexpression CTC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of total 56.2% 43.8% 100.0%