Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 29;27(3):407–418. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9664-x

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison of five image fusion methods with Dataset-1 image pair (shown in Fig. 4a, b)

Quality metric Pixel_avg DWT_avg_max CT_avg_max NSCT_avg_max Proposed method
IE 5.911 6.096 6.199 6.065 6.756
OCE 0.445 0.488 0.468 0.496 0.009
MI 5.166 3.073 2.748 3.318 5.616
SF 10.283 14.282 14.057 13.971 18.468
RSFE −0.5 −0.31 −0.322 −0.325 −0.102
CC(A,F) 0.846 0.823 0.826 0.826 0.909
CC(B,F) 0.575 0.587 0.585 0.591 0.426
Q AB/F 0.425 0.515 0.477 0.565 0.784
Q 0.628 0.64 0.567 0.665 0.934
Q w 0.631 0.66 0.652 0.669 0.845
Q E 0.584 0.613 0.602 0.627 0.735