Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 29;27(3):407–418. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9664-x

Table 2.

Quantitative comparison of five image fusion methods with Data set-2 image pairs (shown in Fig. 5a and b columns)

Quality metric Pixel_avg DWT_avg_max CT_avg_max NSCT_avg_max Proposed method
IE 3.296 4.834 5.213 4.726 4.521
OCE 0.472 0.544 0.595 0.548 0.59
MI 3.08 2.536 2.473 2.652 3.113
SF 14.827 29.117 28.961 28.706 32.704
RSFE −0.6 −0.217 −0.223 −0.229 −0.116
CC(A,F) 0.798 0.781 0.778 0.784 0.691
CC(B,F) 0.88 0.897 0.898 0.9 0.928
Q AB/F 0.213 0.466 0.443 0.528 0.535
Q 0.692 0.676 0.472 0.744 0.783
Q w 0.471 0.679 0.675 0.696 0.768
Q E 0.371 0.51 0.504 0.531 0.572

Values given in Table 2 are the average values of different images pairs of Dataset-2