Skip to main content
. 2014 May 19;9(5):e97616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097616

Table 2. Results of overall and stratified analyses for the associations of ERCC1 polymorphisms and risk of lung cancer**.

Variables No. of Sample size Homozygous Heterozygous Dominant Recessive
studies Case/control OR (95% CI) Phet I2 (%) OR (95% CI) Phet I2 (%) OR (95% CI) Phet I2 (%) OR (95% CI) Phet I2 (%)
rs11615 T>C **
Total 10 7779/10655 1.08 (0.98–1.19) 0.338 11.3 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 0.391 5.4 1.03 (0.96–1.10) 0.379 6.8 1.05 (0.97–1.13) 0.361 8.8
Ethnicities
Asian 5 2236/2235 1.24 (0.97–1.58) 0.151 40.5 1.23 (0.96–1.58) 0295 18.9 1.24 (0.98–1.57) 0.191 34.6 1.05 (0.93–1.18) 0.179 36.3
Caucasian 5 5543/8420 1.05 (0.95–1.17) 0.723 0.0 1.00 (0.93–1.08) 0.697 0.0 1.01 (0.94–1.09) 0.883 0.0 1.05 (0.95–1.16) 0.465 0.0
Source of control
HB 4 3612/5162 1.08 (0.94–1.24) 0.107 50.7 1.05 (0.95–1.16) 0.108 50.6 1.05 (0.95–1.15) 0.09 53.6 1.02 (0.91–1.14) 0.326 13.3
PB 6 4167/5493 1.09 (0.95–1.25) 0.543 0.0 0.99 (0.89–1.09) 0.726 0.0 1.01 (0.92–1.12) 0.70 0.0 1.08 (0.97–1.20) 0.319 14.8
Smoking status
Smokers 3 657/468 2.16 (1.41–3.30) 0.099 56.8 1.77 (1.21–2.60) 0.462 0.0 1.94 (1.36–2.79) 0.234 31.2 1.32 (0.83–2.09) 0.042 68.6
Non-smokers 3 494/616 2.39 (1.47–3.88) 0.542 0.0 2.39 (1.44–3.95) 0.237 30.5 2.40 (1.49–3.85) 0.399 0.0 1.19 (0.94–1.52) 0.628 0.0
rs3212986 C>A
Total 6 6639/8630 1.00 (0.88–1.14) 0.609 0.0 0.97 (0.91–1.04) 0.737 0.0 0.97 (0.91–1.04) 0.784 0.0 1.01 (0.89–1.15) 0.558 0.0
Ethnicities
Asian 2 1188/1186 1.05 (0.80–1.37) 0.905 0.0 1.00 (0.84–1.20) 0.950 0.0 1.01 (0.86–1.20) 0.939 0.0 1.05 (0.83–1.33) 0.846 0.0
Caucasian 4 5451/7444 0.98 (0.85–1.14) 0.330 12.6 0.96 (0.89–1.04) 0.463 0.0 0.97 (0.90–1.04) 0.539 0.0 1.00 (0.86–1.15) 0.287 20.4
Source of control
HB 2 2836/4428 1.00 (0.82–1.21) 0.770 0.0 0.91 (0.83–1.01) 0.777 0.0 0.93 (0.84–1.02) 0.662 0.0 1.04 (0.86–1.24) 0794 0.0
PB 4 3803/4202 1.00 (.83–1.19) 0.319 14.6 1.02 (0.93–1.12) 0.969 0.0 1.02 (0.93–1.11) 0.949 0.0 0.99 (0.83–1.18) 0.288 20.2
rs3212961 A>C
Total 4 1770/1830 0.87 (0.71–1.07) 0.318 14.8 0.92 (0.77–1.11) 0.216 32.7 0.90 (0.76–1.07) 0.167 40.8 0.91 (0.79–1.06) 0.855 0.0
Ethnicities
Asian 3 1436/1428 0.87 (0.71–1.08) 0.177 42.3 0.92 (0.76–1.11) 0.108 55.1 0.91 (0.76–1.08) 0.082 60.1 0.93 (0.79–1.09) 0.749 0.0
Caucasian 1 334/402 0.79(0.36–1.74) 0.92 (0.40–2.10) 0.82 (0.38–1.80) 0.85 (0.61–1.19)
rs3212948 G>C
Total 3 1537/1835 0.84 (0.65–1.08) 0.643 0.0 0.78 (0.67–0.90) 0.321 12.0 0.79 (0.69–0.90) 0.287 19.9 0.93 (0.73–1.19) 0.782 0.0
rs2298881 C>A
Total 4 4653/6921 1.11 (0.91–1.36) 0.938 0.0 1.03 (0.94–1.13) 0.530 0.0 1.04 (0.95–1.13) 0.530 0.0 1.10 (0.91–1.32) 0.964 0.0
Ethnicities
Asian 2 1317/1329 1.13 (0.90–1.43) 0.562 0.0 1.04 (0.88–1.22) 0.732 0.0 1.06 (0.90–1.24) 0.623 0.0 1.11 (0.90–1.37) 0.634 0.0
Caucasian 2 3336/5592 1.06 (0.73–1.56) 0.992 0.0 1.03 (0.92–1.15) 0.148 52.1 1.03 (0.93–1.14) 0.168 47.3 1.06 (0.72–1.55) 0.926 0.0

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. The results were in bold, if the 95% CI excluded 1 or P<0.05.

P het value of Q-test for heterogeneity test; random-effects model was used when P<0.05 for heterogeneity test; otherwise, fixed-effects model was used. Significant results are listed in bold.

**Study by Zienolddiny et al. was excluded for rs11615 analysis.