Table 2.
Improvement in accuracy | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Readers | Data set A | Data set B | Improvement | McNemar values | Cl values |
Experienced radiologist | 82.2% | 95% | 12.9% | 0.002 | 6.5%–12.9% |
Less experienced radiologist | 84.2% | 94.15% | 9.9% | 0.006 | 2.7%–11.6% |
Improvement in accuracy | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Readers | Data set A | Data set B | Improvement | McNemar values | Cl values |
Experienced radiologist | 82.2% | 95% | 12.9% | 0.002 | 6.5%–12.9% |
Less experienced radiologist | 84.2% | 94.15% | 9.9% | 0.006 | 2.7%–11.6% |