Table I.
Latent Growth Curve Model Predicting Parental Responsibility Initial Status and Linear Change From Pubertal Status and Efficacy
| Predictors | Adolescent report |
Mother report |
Father report |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responsibility initial status | Responsibility linear change | Responsibility initial status | Responsibility linear change | Responsibility initial status | Responsibility linear change | |
| Adolescent gender | −.005 (.072) | .008 (.015) | −.083 (.063) | −.015 (.017) | −.054 (.079) | .007 (.018) |
| Adolescent age | −.159 (.033)** | .003 (.007) | −.137 (.027)** | .001 (.003) | −.205 (.034)** | .005 (.009) |
| Time since diagnosis | .030 (.010)** | −.001 (.002) | .023 (.009)** | .000 (.008) | .047 (.012)** | −.004 (.004) |
| Puberty initial status | −.140 (.030)** | −.050 (.015)** | −.146 (.020)** | .008 (.016) | −.131 (.026)** | −.030 (.023) |
| Efficacy initial status | −.131 (.071)† | −.014 (.007)* | −.146 (.057)* | .006 (.006) | −.081 (.081) | −.002 (.006) |
| Responsibility initial status | – | −.099 (.017)** | – | .000 (.020) | – | −.034 (.023) |
| Puberty linear change | – | −.300 (.074)** | – | −.226 (.109)* | – | −.067 (.118) |
| Efficacy linear change | – | −.079 (.041)* | – | −.197 (.093)* | – | −.118 (.092) |
| Fit statistics | ||||||
| χ2 | 360.998/197 | 435.852/197 | 333.155/197 | |||
| RMSEA | .057 | .069 | .052 | |||
| CFI | .953 | .943 | .951 | |||
| TLI | .951 | .940 | .949 | |||
Note. All parameters are unstandardized with standard errors in parentheses. Paths from efficacy and pubertal status linear change to parental involvement initial status were not estimated. RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker Lewis index. †p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01.