Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 9;14:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-79

Table 3.

Florbenazine SUVR by Clinical Diagnosis for each striatal region

  HC PD AD DLB P value Pair-wise comparison
Whole striatum*
2.84 (0.552)
1.72 (0.172)
3.04 (0.579)
1.87 (0.372)
0.0001
a, c, d, f
Caudate
2.60(0.529)
1.77 (0.415)
2.21 (0.458)
1.79 (0.418)
0.0303
c, f
Anterior putamen
2.98 (0.601)
1.86 (0.084)
3.39 (0.744)
2.05 (0.519)
0.0003
a, c, d, f
Posterior putamen
2.93 (0.529)
1.53 (0.104)
3.52 (0.758)
1.78 (0.400)
<0.0001
a, c, d, f
Lower posterior putamen**
2.82 (0.474)
1.46 (0.120)
3.41 (0.753)
1.67 (0.427)
<0.0001
a, c, d, f
Laterality index***
0.94 (0.029)
0.91 (0.043)
0.94 (0.032)
0.88 (0.105)
0.5582
 
Caudate/putamen ratio**** 0.88 (0.035) 1.15 (0.240) 0.64 (0.151) 1.03 (0.240) 0.0011 b, d, f

*Average of left and right caudate, anterior putamen and posterior putamen.

**Posterior putamen with lower SUVr for each subject.

***Ratio of lower to higher posterior putamen for each subject. A higher value indicates greater asymmetry.

****Ratio of average caudate (left and right) to average posterior putamen (left and right). A higher value indicates greater difference between the caudate and posterior putamen.

Mean SUVr values (and SD) are given for each group. P-values are for the overall group comparison from Kruskal-Wallis test. Subsequent pair-wise comparisons are noted by the letters in the last column if the overall comparison was significant (p value < 0.05; a = HC vs. PD; b = HC vs. AD; c = HC vs. DLB; d = PD vs. AD; e = PD vs. DLB; f = AD vs. DLB).