Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014 Jan 1;36(1):187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.022

Table 4.

Summary of multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analyses for associations between school suspension and student and school level factors

Null Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Covariates OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Male 2.89 (2.21-3.80)*** 2.32 (1.72-3.13)*** 2.74 (2.10-3.58)*** 2.25 (1.67-3.02)***
Student level factors
Welfare 1.50 (1.11-2.01)** 1.34 (1.00-1.80)
Parents’ low ed. 1.51 (1.05-2.17)* 1.29 (.90-1.84)
Antisocial behavior 2.56 (1.89-3.46)*** 2.50 (1.85-3.38)***
Violent behavior 3.00 (2.08-4.32)*** 2.87 (2.00-4.12)***
Transitions/mobility 1.05 (.87-1.32) 1.04 (.85-1.28)
Low school commitment 1.23 (.86-1.30) 1.20 (.92-1.55)
Rebelliousness 1.57 (1.23-2.00)*** 1.48 (1.16-1.89)**
Academic failure 2.31 (1.84-2.90)*** 2.30 (1.84-2.88)***
School level factors
Low school SES 1.03 (1.02-1.04)*** 1.02 (1.01-1.03)***
School type (other) 1.40 (.81-2.43) 1.56 (.86-2.81)
Low school
commitment
7.31 (3.00-17.84)*** 2.88 (1.05-7.88)*
Teacher supportive
relationships
.51 (.15-1.80) .58 (.15-2.30)
σ2 Between .74 .74 .49 .20 .22
df 2 5 13 10 18
−2LL −973.16 −936.53 −762.68 −896.73 −741.37
AIC 1950.32 1883.06 1551.36 1813.45 1518.74
BIC 1962.41 1913.3 1629.68 1873.93 1627.59

Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; σ2 = population variance; df = degrees of freedom; -2LL = likelihood ratio; AIC = Akaike’s information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.

State, age, and school size were included in the analyses but are not presented in Table 4 because they showed consistently statistically non-significant associations with school suspension.