Skip to main content
. 2014 May 6;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-16-31

Table 5.

Comparison of previously published ADC and FA values with those measured in this study

Reference Field strength (T) Voxel size (mm3) ADC (x10-3mm2/s)
FA
Notes
Healthy volunteers Disease
Healthy volunteers Disease
(% change) (% change)
Reese et al. [8]
1.5
3 × 3 × 9
0.87 ± 0.11
 
0.65 ± 0.03
 
 
Dou et al. [10]
1.5
4 × 4 × 12
0.60 ± 0.11
 
0.7 ± 0.1
 
 
Tseng et al. [1] (HCM)
1.5
3 × 3 × 3
not reported
 
0.78
0.75 (-4%)
Free wall
0.72
0.56 (-22%)
Septum
Wu et al. [2] (MI)
1.5
1.9 × 1.9 × 8
0.65 ± 0.03
0.92 (+46%)
0.33 ± 0.02
0.25 (-26%)
Acute
0.74 (+17%)
0.27 (-21%)
Chronic
Nielles-Vallespin et al. [12]
3.0
2.9 × 2.9 × 8
0.8 ± 0.1
-
0.60 ± 0.04
-
 
McGill et al. [22] (HCM)
3.0
2.9 × 2.9 × 8
-
0.73 (-9%)
-
0.62 (+3%)
This work 3.0 2.9 × 2.9 × 8 1.10 ± 0.06
  0.41 ± 0.04
  Systole
1.20 ± 0.09 0.54 ± 0.03 Diastole

Caption: This table includes mean healthy values for systolic ADC and FA (±standard deviation where stated) using monopolar STEAM DT-CMR sequences previously reported in the literature, and changes reported in two diseases: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and acute and chronic myocardial infarction (MI).