Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2014 Mar 28;343(6178):1478–1485. doi: 10.1126/science.1248429

Table 2.

Abecedarian Intervention, Females: Main Health Results, Biomedical Sweep. This table presents the inference and descriptive statistics of selected outcomes of the Abecedarian Intervention. The first column describes the outcome analyzed. The remaining six columns present the statistical analysis. The columns present the following information: (1) control mean; (2) treatment mean; (3) unconditional difference in means across treatment and control groups. We multiply the difference in means by (−1) when a higher value of the variable in the raw data represents a worse outcome so that all outcomes are normalized in a favorable direction (but are not restricted to be positive). (4) conditional treatment effect controlling for cohort, number of siblings, mother’s IQ and high-risk index at birth, and accounting for attrition using Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW). Probabilities of IPW are estimated using the following variables for the biomedical sweep outcomes: prematurity (gestational age <37 weeks), mother WAIS digit symbol score at recruitment, Achenbach rule breaking problem scale at age 30, and Achenbach substance abuse scale at age 30. The selection of covariates for IPW is based on the lowest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) among models examining all combinations of covariates that present statistically significant imbalance between attriters and non-attriters. See Supplementary Material Section C and Table S2 for details. (5) one-sided single hypothesis block permutation p-value associated with the IPW treatment effect estimate. By block permutation we mean that permutations are done within strata defined by the pre-program variables used in the randomization protocol: cohort, gender, number of siblings, mother’s IQ, and high-risk index. (6) Multiple Hypothesis stepdown p -values associated with (5). The multiple hypothesis testing is applied to blocks of outcomes. Blocks of variables that are tested jointly using the stepdown algorithm are delineated by horizontal lines. p-values ≤0.10 are in bold type. BMI: Body Mass Index; HbA1C: Glycosylated Hemoglobin; NCEP: National Cholesterol Education Program. See Table S12 for complete estimation results.

Variable Control
Mean
Treatment
Mean
Difference
in Means
Conditional
Treatment
Effect
Block
p-value
Step-Down
p-value

Blood Pressure

Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) 89.227 85.333 3.894 1.204 0.446 0.446
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) 135.636 129.666 5.970 2.185 0.300 0.380

Pre-Hypertension (systolic bp ≥ 120 & diastolic bp ≥ 80) 0.727 0.500 0.227 0.101 0.222 0.222
Pre-Hypertension (systolic bp ≥ 120 or diastolic bp ≥ 80) 0.909 0.667 .242 0.244 0.042 0.069

Hypertension (systolic bp ≥ 140 & diastolic bp ≥ 90) 0.318 0.222 0.096 −0.003 0.375 0.499
Hypertension (systolic bp ≥ 140 or diastolic bp ≥ 90) 0.409 0.500 −0.091 −0.181 0.721 0.721

Lab Tests

High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mg/dL) 55.318 60.444 5.126 6.002 0.143 0.143
Dyslipidemia (HDL < 50 mg/dL) 0.455 0.278 0.177 0.201 0.099 0.147

Pre-Diabetes (HbA1C ≥ 5.7%) 0.364 0.353 0.011 0.070 0.580 0.580

Vitamin D Deficiency ( < 20 ng/mL) 0.727 0.722 0.005 0.048 0.303 0.303

Obesity

Overweight (BMI ≥ 25) 0.955 0.889 0.066 0.054 0.482 0.690
Obese (BMI ≥ 30) 0.727 0.666 0.061 −0.112 0.790 0.790
Severely Obese (BMI ≥ 35) 0.364 0.223 0.141 0.143 0.354 0.653

Waist-Hip Ratio (WHR) 0.933 0.876 0.057 0.053 0.063 0.101
Abdominal Obesity (WHR > 0.85) 0.762 0.563 0.199 0.198 0.080 0.080

Multiple Risk Factors

Obesity & Hypertension 0.364 0.278 0.086 −0.028 0.501 0.641
Severe Obesity & Hypertension 0.136 0.167 −0.030 −0.066 0.696 0.696
Hypertension & Dyslipidemia 0.182 0.167 0.015 −0.043 0.486 0.725
Metabolic Syndrome (NCEP Definition) 0.190 0.062 0.128 0.057 0.184 0.393

Framingham Risk Score (35) 1.482 1.143 0.339 0.331 0.070 0.070