Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Abus. 2011 Oct;32(4):220–224. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2011.598408

Table.

Residents’ self assessed responsibility, confidence, competence and interest in caring for drug users

Variable Residents with Positive Response, Before N (%) Residents with Positive Response, After N (%) P-value
How responsible do you feel for:
 Screening for drug problems 51 (88) 50 (86) NS
 Counseling about drug problems 43 (74) 52 (90) 0.01
How confident are you in your skills at:
 Discussing drugs of abuse 30 (52) 42 (72) 0.05
 Discussing drug treatment options 3 (5) 30 (52) <0.001
 Counseling patients about drug problems 10 (17) 33 (57) <0.001
 Initiating change in patients’ drug use 11 (19) 30 (52) <0.001
How competent and interested are you in:
Using structured alcohol screening tools
 Competence 12 (21) 20 (34) NS
 Interest 18 (32) 28 (49) <0.05
Detecting and assessing clinical manifestations of drug and alcohol use
 Competence 7 (12) 17 (29) <0.05
 Interest 23(40) 29 (50) NS
Using “stages of change” model to assess patient motivation and guiding intervention
 Competence 5 (9) 19 (33) <0.001
 Interest 21 (37) 23 (40) NS
Knowledge and ability to refer to 12 step programs for SUD treatment
 Competence 5 (9) 25 (43) <0.001
 Interest 18 (32) 28 (49) NS
Understanding personal experiences of addicted individuals in trying to be sober
 Competence 7 (12) 23 (40) <0.001
 Interest 27 (47) 32 (55) NS

For residents’ sense of responsibility and confidence, responses were on a 1 – 5 scale where: 1=not at all responsible/confident, and 5=very responsible/confident. We report the proportion of residents who responded positively (4 or 5 versus all others). For residents’ competence and interest variables, responses were on a 1 – 10 scale where 1-3= not very competent/interested, 4-7=moderately competent/interested, and 8-10=very competent/interested. We report proportion of residents who responded positively (8-10 versus all others).