Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 7;6:85. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-85

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 45 AML patients at diagnosis

  All patients
FISH + CD34 + CD38-
FISH + CD34 + CD38-
P value
N = 45 <1%
≥1%
N = 20 N = 25
Gender
 
 
 
 
  Male(%)
25(55.6)
10(50)
15(60)
0.557
  Female(%)
20(44.4)
10(50)
10(40)
 
Age, Median(range)
42(14–71)
36(19–71)
45(14–66)
0.5600
WBC, Median(range)
14.5(0.63-143)
12.4(0.63-125.24)
14.9(1.7-143)
0.9091
PLT, Median(range)
42(4–191)
28(4–191)
48(16–157)
0.198
BM blast%
58(18–96)
52.5(20–94.5)
62(18–96)
0.265
FAB subtype
 
 
 
0.694
  M1
5
2
3
 
  M2
18
10
8
 
  M4
12
5
7
 
  M5
9
3
6
 
  M6
1
0
1
 
Cytogenetics risk
 
 
 
0.894
  Favorable
24
10
14
 
  Intermediate
12
6
6
 
  Poor
9
4
5
 
FLT3 mutations (%)
5(11.1)
2(10)
3(12)
1
Allo-HSCT(%) 14(31.1) 6(30) 8(32) 1

Patients were stratified into favorable (cases with t(8;21), or inv(16), excluding complex cytogenetic), poor (cases with complex cytogenetic changes three or more unrelated abnormalities, t(6;9) or 11q23 abnormalities [excluding t(9;11)]), and intermediate (cases with t(9;11), trisomy 8, 7q-, 9q-, or trisomy 21) risk groups.